Dangerfield v Sylvia

Written by Motts on March 28 2011

After one weekend of footy, lets put 2 of the more popular M/F DPP’s up against one another. Who would you rather have in your team? Format is (Price, R1 score, 2010 average, 2011 preseason average).

Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.
0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

11 thoughts on “Dangerfield v Sylvia”

  1. If you wait until after this week, you can get Danger @ the same price with only one bye to serve out. Danger is looking at a break out season, is cheaper and less prone to trouble than Sylvia.
    Danger for me.

    0

    0
  2. I’ve got Sylvia and I think he’ll have a break out year. I had danger but swapped him for Higgins that could have been a mistake

    0

    0
  3. Hard to judge Higgins b/c doggies were so poor. He seemed to be one of their better players.

    0

    0
  4. Danger was in trouble at Half time with 20 SC points. Then had 10 touches & a few goals in 1 qtr to inflate his score. So not consistent enough for me. Still feeling the burn marks from last year.

    0

    0
  5. Checked the dees website – Sylvia was a naughty boy again and was lucky to play yesterday – so his off field behaviour doesn’t seem to have improved.

    0

    0
  6. Higgo did score above his 2010 average.
    You’re getting more than your paying for.
    Can’t complain.

    0

    0
  7. I think Stranger Danger will be a genuine A grade midfielder in time… I just wish Craig would play him in the middle, I watched the game and Danger turned the game when he played middle and pushed forward…. But he’s no good starting in the forward line (too short, and not aboriginal enough)

    0

    0

Leave a Reply to Giller Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *