Gibbs v Deledio

Written by Motts on February 26 2011

Without doubt, the biggest backline question of the year. Gibbs or Lids. I know many of you have both, but who did you pick first?

Do we need more 'Trade Talk' threads during the week?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

18 thoughts on “Gibbs v Deledio”

  1. Both will be in most teams but if I had to choose i would go with lids for the simple reason that the tigers do not have a bye during Supercoach finals. Trades are gold especially at finals time when gun players are rested.

    0

    0
  2. i think lids, purely on the fact the he is a premium in a ‘under preforming’ team. If richmond gets better, so will his scores whereas Gibbs is in a decent team, so i think if for some reason Carlton under perform there is more chance of gibbs being a risk than delidio

    0

    0
  3. Not sure where to post this, but…
    Hayes or Bartel?
    Both down on there averages from previous years, both could unleash.
    Thoughts?

    0

    0
  4. I have been reading over the teams for a while now and it seems to me Juddy isn’t very popular this year is there something i missed??

    0

    0
  5. hey guys needing some help with picking my last middle dynamo
    options are M, Boyd J, Kennedy (SYD) T, Boak T, Cotchin who would be the better op
    i have 518 k in the bank anyone i missed ??
    all comments are great recieved.

    thanks guys

    0

    0
  6. These are great bargains from Adelaide
    N van Berlo-Midfield 376,700
    B Vince-Midfield 378,000
    C Nights- Forward 237,500
    A Otten- Backline 185,100

    0

    0
  7. I will actually go with Deledio because first of all you save money and Deledio will get alot of disposals. Thats why I would got with Deledio

    0

    0
  8. Gibbs, Judd and Murphy will have the hard tags which will free up Gibbs, while Deledio will have a heavy forward tag throughout the season.

    0

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *