Goodes v ROK

Written by Motts on June 3 2010

Both have dropped $190k since the beginning of the year, both have been struggling for form, both are averaging between 85 and 92. Which F/M DPP premium would you bring in first right now?

Supercoach Talk Champion Round 7

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

18 thoughts on “Goodes v ROK”

  1. I was so stoked when I brought Goodesy in at $516k, i was thinking what a steal! Then he drops another 100k and im like damn!! I’m trying to bring in okeefe either this week or next week, im trying to do a dustin martin> o’keefe trade, but i dont quite have enough funds to do so… I think i will wait and hope martin goes up again in value and o’keefe go down…here’s to hoping…

    But if you had neither, Goodes is a safer option ๐Ÿ™‚

    0

    0
    1. I have both and I think we all know how pissed I am about the Gia->Goodes trade (which I also made when Goodes was $516k).

      Will keep playing both on the field but it looks to me like Goodes has turned the corner first.

      0

      0
  2. I’m running with ROK, he has served me well so far this year. Goodes is cheap, but I think that if I made a f/l trade it’d be Gia/Balla into Chappy/Daisy Thomas- have no idea if those numbers fit- and ideally it would be a finals trade.

    I’ve been thinking about Karmichael Hunt in a SC context. How much will he cost? Will it be in proportion to his wage, or, will he be priced as a rookie? Will people take a punt on him and recruit him into their team?

    0

    0
    1. Speaking of the Gold Coast, has anyone thought about the fact that there will be a bye each week in the AFL next year?.How will the Supercoach Admin team deal with that?

      What if u have 5 players from Geelong and they have a bye? What happens to ur 5 scores?

      Expect a cap on selections from each team to be introduced next year for coaches protection, it does serve up some interesting thoughts tho doesnt it?

      Any ideas Motts?

      0

      0
      1. Ha, just read ur Random Thoughts post and relaised I have said the exact same thing.

        Great minds think alike eh Motts?

        0

        0
        1. Correct. Will be very interested to see how they handle it. I’ll have to kiss goodbye to my DT midfield: Judd, Gibbs, Murphy, Simpson and Robinson.

          0

          0
  3. Im one of the lucky ones who has had goodes since the start of the year. Costing a whopping 607 k, has been a massive let down, but he is a premium and he IS going to bounce back SOON!!!!

    0

    0
  4. I still haven’t traded Brennan out since his injury and have been monitoring Goodes and O’Keefe closely.

    Was VERY close to bringing ROK in last week but will probably hold off given than I’m still pulling 2300 a week without either of them.

    0

    0
  5. I bought goodes last week and ROK this week, hopefully they both pay off. both are in my forward line as they dont make the cut in my midfield which consists of GAJ, JUDD, GIBBS, j.SELWOOD, COONEY, PENDLES

    0

    0
    1. currently ranked 5000 odd and consistently being let down by NIC NAT, HILLE, HALL, ROUGHIE and CYRIL. all the rest of my team average over 100

      0

      0
  6. HODGE, GODDARD, H.SHAW, MALCESKI, ENRIGHT, H. OBRIEN and WATERS (sorry waters and obrien arent quite at the 100) also got goose as a back-up

    0

    0
    1. forwards are Brown, Goodes, ROK, higgins, roughead, rioli and hall (gumby on the bench)

      rucks as stated are Hille and NIC NAT with skipper on the pine.

      0

      0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Goodes v ROK

Written by Motts on

Both have dropped $190k since the beginning of the year, both have been struggling for form, both are averaging between 85 and 92. Which F/M DPP premium would you bring in first right now?

Supercoach Talk Champion Round 7

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

18 thoughts on “Goodes v ROK”

  1. I was so stoked when I brought Goodesy in at $516k, i was thinking what a steal! Then he drops another 100k and im like damn!! I’m trying to bring in okeefe either this week or next week, im trying to do a dustin martin> o’keefe trade, but i dont quite have enough funds to do so… I think i will wait and hope martin goes up again in value and o’keefe go down…here’s to hoping…

    But if you had neither, Goodes is a safer option ๐Ÿ™‚

    0

    0
  2. I’m running with ROK, he has served me well so far this year. Goodes is cheap, but I think that if I made a f/l trade it’d be Gia/Balla into Chappy/Daisy Thomas- have no idea if those numbers fit- and ideally it would be a finals trade.

    I’ve been thinking about Karmichael Hunt in a SC context. How much will he cost? Will it be in proportion to his wage, or, will he be priced as a rookie? Will people take a punt on him and recruit him into their team?

    0

    0
  3. Im one of the lucky ones who has had goodes since the start of the year. Costing a whopping 607 k, has been a massive let down, but he is a premium and he IS going to bounce back SOON!!!!

    0

    0
  4. I still haven’t traded Brennan out since his injury and have been monitoring Goodes and O’Keefe closely.

    Was VERY close to bringing ROK in last week but will probably hold off given than I’m still pulling 2300 a week without either of them.

    0

    0
  5. I bought goodes last week and ROK this week, hopefully they both pay off. both are in my forward line as they dont make the cut in my midfield which consists of GAJ, JUDD, GIBBS, j.SELWOOD, COONEY, PENDLES

    0

    0
  6. HODGE, GODDARD, H.SHAW, MALCESKI, ENRIGHT, H. OBRIEN and WATERS (sorry waters and obrien arent quite at the 100) also got goose as a back-up

    0

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *