B Hudson ($440,800 $+19,700 ($+120,300), 80.75) – Can’t ignore the flying beard any longer. Last 3 round average: 103. BE: 76.
And…..
K Bradley ($453,200 $+26,900 ($+130,600), 107.20) – With the second highest average amongst the rucks its pretty hard to ignore K-Brad. Don’t expect to see any reports of me picking him up though – I’m still convinced he’s a flash in the pan. In fact I’m still convinced his team is as well. Go Blues!
Gotta apologise for the lack of posts from me the last couple of days – have been in a large windowless room. No, not a jail cell. I’ve been in a work thing at Jeff’s Shed. I have been avidly reading posts though whilst I was supposed to have been listening to the learned speakers. Deano, no offence taken whatsoever 
Related Posts:
, later Smurfs.
{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }
I’m continuing my embargo on embracing KB completely aware of the fact that I have not employed any fairness, reason, logic or any type of appropriate consideration whatsoever to my deliberations.
This is in spite of the fact that I like Freo and admire their courage in establishing and persisting with that theme song of theirs.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Great song!! Look forward to hearing it Saturday!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
hey guys quick question
upgrading nic nac just not sure to who
big cox, ryder or the kruz
ive got big sandi
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think you’ll find that most people go for big cox.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
yeah thats what i was thinking just concern about the big cox’s body
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Duck loves big cox.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Deano loves little dick.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Doesn’t hurt that much.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
what does everybody think about hamish mcintosh??
thinking about trading nic nat for h-mac ??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sideways – waste of a trade.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
mcintosh more consistant then nic nat
plus mcintosh should get his B/E this week
nic nat unlikley
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
David astbury need someone sitting on the bench + earn a bitta money in the process worth it ??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
His B/E has reached his average so won’t make you any more reasonable $ now. Consider Henderson as forward/def DPP on the bubble (wait for teams to be named next week) or wait to see how Stryk goes. Not alot around at the moment and as with my previous post, this is the time of year when patience in trading is paramount.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Both average the same, MAC is $60K more and has a scoring range of 28 – 102 while NAT has 43 – 126 – hard to make an argument that one is more/less consistent than the other.
Breakevens are marginal and only really come into play if you plan to on trade MAC in the future.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
yes yes you make a compelling agrument deano
will stick with nic nat
how about david astubury rate him or not ?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
See above – I’d wait unless you have trades to burn – even then you run the risk of having a 200K piece of dead wood that’s hard to move on on the bench.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Last minute decision for captain Hodge or Sandilands??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0