2013 Byes



Motts Movers R5, 2012 – The Mids

by Motts on May 2, 2012

Premiums

Tom Rockliff ($608,000, 123, 58) – I have a mate, Bob, who traded Rocky out of his team after his R2 61. Since then he’s gone on to score 108, 167 & then 140 in the wet last week. I’d call Bob a dope but at the moment he’s leading my cash league #betheslowontradesthough

Dane Swan ($620,200, 120.4, 71) – Don’t call him chubby.

Josh Kennedy ($587,800, 133.8, 73) – The league’s current Golden Child. Put some spare change on him for the Brownlow coz I reckon he’s polled in each of the first 5 games. In those games he scored 137, 139, 113, 107, and 173.

Mid-Pricers

Nathan Foley ($502,500, 99.6, 75) – 113 avg in his last 3 against Melbourne, West Coast & Geelong.

Jaren Brennan ($501,500, 105.6, 86) – Will pick up the Ablett slack. Freo this week then GWS the next.

Michael Barlow ($465,400, 90.6, 74) – GC and Port are his next 2 games.

Value Picks

Jesse Stringer ($113,200) – 87 in his second game with a -59 BE this week.

Kyal Horsely ($128,700) – 87 in his first game.

Taylor Adams ($136,600) – 80 in his first game and a M/F DPP.

Threw this together tonight because I’m pressed for time. Have no doubt I’ve missed some worthy players. Who would you add to this list?

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

Duck May 2, 2012 at 7:38 pm

Pleases me that BOB has done that ….. another poor decision, like the Falau one!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Reply

steven sexton May 2, 2012 at 8:21 pm

what happened to anothony miles. his first game scores well, somewhere around 100 and then is ommitted the following week? what is the deal kevin?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

DamenS May 2, 2012 at 8:41 pm

His disposal skills aren’t great – which is why he tends to do better in DT. Not considered “best 22″ by GWS at the moment, though he had one of their highest DT averages in the NEAFL last year.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3

Reply

deano May 2, 2012 at 9:40 pm

Why would someone thumb down that post?

It is an accurate assessment of why he’s not playing. Hopefully he will improve in the magoos and provide us with a valuable downgrade target.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3

Reply

Tom May 2, 2012 at 8:26 pm

Worth making some cash and trading coniglio down for stringer? Will he play at all ?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6

Reply

Leo Messi May 2, 2012 at 9:16 pm

Off twitter

Mckenna: Gary Ablett is a good chance for next week. Has full flexibility back today.” Think I’ll keep him #supercoach

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

Reply

Yiorgakis May 2, 2012 at 9:32 pm

Yeah, I’m with you now Leo. I saw the article earlier today that the knee wasn’t responding and convinced myself to trade him, but now I’m thinking I might hold.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

Reply

Piehole May 2, 2012 at 9:17 pm

I’m trading ablett but who for

Thumb up Pendles
Thumbs down Rockliff

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 10

Reply

Jester May 3, 2012 at 1:48 pm

I suggest you hold

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Reply

Sam May 2, 2012 at 10:00 pm

Some people can’t handle the truth.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

Reply

Catta May 2, 2012 at 10:39 pm
underrated May 2, 2012 at 11:37 pm

hahaha thats a good one

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

Reply

Razzle May 2, 2012 at 11:08 pm

don’t known how lenny hayes didn’t make the cut. seems to be doing everything right

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

Reply

gimmeguitars May 3, 2012 at 8:29 pm

Motts has an aversion to knees and age.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

underrated May 2, 2012 at 11:36 pm

I have a question for everyone….
Conilgio for Pendles—Tumbs Up
or Coniligo for Marc Murphy—Thumbs Down
Thoughts and Comments? But you can’t go wrong with either, both top draw

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4

Reply

Fishtopher May 2, 2012 at 11:40 pm

I reckon Pendles will be ahead come the end of the year but there won’t be much in it. Maybe worth taking the byes into consideration and go with which ever fits your team structure better.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Reply

Beas May 3, 2012 at 6:25 am

I’d also look at which gets tagged more – I’m guessing Judd usually gets the #1 tag at Cartlon, like pendlebury at Collingwobbles, so probably Murphy.

@Fishtopher, I’ve never taken the byes in consideration cos I’m playing for league wins, but right now something tells me I should have done so…?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

Reply

Stoney May 3, 2012 at 8:22 am

beas no matter how much they tag both of them they will keep smashing out 100′s
and i think pendles underrated

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

Beas May 3, 2012 at 8:41 am

Well, I said that cos Murphy hasn’t scored below 118, and Judd scored under 100 3 times this year. Judd scored 87 last week with the Crowley tag. That might help Murphy out-score Pendles overall. BUT I just realised that Pendles’ average without that 60-something vs Carlton is 142, so I take my comment back… so thumb up to Pendles.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

ads10 May 3, 2012 at 9:16 am

take pendles poor game out against the blues and he is averaging around the 120 mark and i reckon more likely to get you those 160-170s every now and then where as murphy is a consistant 100 getter around the 100-120 mark

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

ads10 May 3, 2012 at 9:19 am

im really tempted in getting kennedy mainly for his cheaper price compared to the other high scorers. the things holding me off are as follows;

will the swans sustain their good form
will opposition teams work him out to limit his work at stoppages

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Reply

Sean May 3, 2012 at 11:00 am

This might help:

Kennedy wins his own ball. He is a big guy and damn near untackleable, and he can handle a tag. He’s also been handy up forward as he can take a decent mark in a team which has struggled to do that (our smalls and mids are scoring most of the goals).

He might have down games, but he’s a gun carrying on his form from the end of last year. We’ve also got a seriously strong midfield, which means he has a LOT of inside mid support in Bolton, Parker, Hannebery, McVeigh and Jack plus a slew of cameo players (Craig Bird, Nick Smith, ROK, McGlynn).

This can cut both ways – it means from an opposition coach perspective that there’s no point focussing all attention on him (all it means is less attention on the other tough inside mids), but it also means that there are likely to be games when others get more of the ball.

As for Sydney’s form, as a Swans supporter I’m conditioned to expect us to win the unwinnable and lose the unloseable. So I’m the last person to suggest it will hold, BUT our opponents up to the bye are Adelaide, Richmond, Melbourne, St Kilda, the Bulldogs and Essendon. After that there’s still games against GWS, Gold Coast and Brisbane to come.

However, our finals run is Collingwood, Dogs, Hawthorn (SCG) and Geelong (Kardinia) so that may give you pause.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Reply

ads10 May 3, 2012 at 2:00 pm

cheers sean

you have done a mighty job. much appreciated

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

Calvin May 3, 2012 at 5:46 pm

Hey guys, my trades for this week.
Wingard >>> Pfeiffer
D.Smith >>> Stringer
Not really sure whether to trade D.Smith or not for Stringer, or even at all.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

Reply

underrated May 4, 2012 at 10:47 am

Thanks for the input guys…..helped a little….sorta, but i think i might go with pendles, as ads10 said pendles will get the odd score over 150
I’ll be targeting Murphy towards the end of year before finals

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: