Pavlich v Goodes

Written by Motts on March 16 2011

Coupla old workhorses that will rotate between your midfield and your forward line. Who would you snaffle first?

What should the TEAM do with Marcus Adams (WBD)?

  • TRADE (79%, 84 Votes)
  • HOLD (21%, 23 Votes)

Total Voters: 107

Loading ... Loading ...
0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

9 thoughts on “Pavlich v Goodes”

  1. Oops just noticed I polled this about a month ago. Ah well, we’ll see if sentiment has changed since the preseason has been played out.

    0

    0
  2. Goodes v Pavlich
    by Motts on February 11, 2011

    Matthew Pavlich ($483,300, 99.3) (65%, 115 Votes)
    Adam Goodes ($458,900, 94.3) (35%, 62 Votes)

    Pavlich v Goodes
    by Motts on March 16, 2011

    Adam Goodes ($458,900, 94.3) (58%, 59 Votes)
    Matthew Pavlich ($483,300, 99.3) (42%, 42 Votes)

    Apparently Goodes’ ripper of a pre-season has turned the tables.
    Personally, I have both, but voted for Goodes AND THE ALMIGHTY SWANS 😀

    0

    0
  3. Okay I have two choices maybe you guys can help me?
    I can have
    Warnock + Goodes
    or
    Jolly + Josh Kennedy
    advice?

    0

    0
  4. Useful info from SEN tonight .. they were chatting with Stewie Dew who’s assistant coach at the Swans and he said Goodes would play more in the midfield if/when Bradshaw is fit. He went on to say that Bradshaw is possibly going to play for in a praccy match this weekend so his fitness is coming back. Interestingly, he was glowing in his talk of Kennedy and had no idea how good he could be for them this year. He’s already in my team but now he’s definitely in my team.

    0

    0
  5. I’ve had goodes and Kennedy at one time or another this year now I have a. Swallow and varcoe. Very torn now. Should I stick with varcoe or get Kennedy I can rearrange my team

    0

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *