23 thoughts on “Progress Scores Rd10”

  1. 113/1/McCrae into Neal

    Tossing up whether to take Georgiades score or not.

    I feel already is all one big round that started last Wednesday ^^

    2

    0
    1. Macrae was stiffed. Would’ve scored 140+ if the brain dead coaching panel didn’t put him in the ruck for the last 5-10 mins.
      Game on the line and you put your best ball winner in that position. Would’ve been better to have no ruck whatsoever.

      9

      0
      1. It requires 2 of Corr, Hamill, Mahony, Bennell and Rankine to score better than 68, as well as no awful score from a premium. Thanks

        0

        3
    1. Up to 1407 / 14 / Grundy (C)

      Brought in Tom Stewart for the 2nd lowest score in my team haha but still projected 2100.

      1

      1
  2. 914 / 8 of 21 / Neale

    Thank you V/C Macrae for only getting 113, it made the job of Captaining Neale so much easier.

    I started Short @$349k way back in R1 when Houli was missing for 6-8 weeks. He was pretty average when Bacha returned. Then great again with Houli missing. But I fear his big scoring days are numbered. Houli is most likely back R12. I may sideways to Sicily (post Bye). He ( Short ) should be $500k by then so he has more than done his job.

    2

    1
  3. 1692/14 of 21/Neale

    Very easy watch tonight with Oliver, Trac, Viney, Laird, Gawn and Doedee who fought back in the 2nd half.

    5

    0
  4. 1420/13 of 21/Neale

    Projected 2114 at this stage.

    Really happy with Oliver and Laird tonight,
    Also happy with Simpkin hitting 103 after he was projected to score 71.

    Now just need some big games from the likes of Adams, Kelly and Haynes.

    Enjoying this round of footy so far.

    2

    1
  5. 1421 / 14 of 22 / Neale

    Projected 2047, but will be lucky to break 2000. Projected score started before the round at 2390 but it’s been going down faster than Dev Smith’s ownership.

    1

    1
  6. 2025 / 17 / Neale VC

    Jelly, Whitfield, Haynes, Ridley to come and who’ll hopefully replace my lowest scores from McKay, Simpson, and Pickett.

    2

    0
      1. Yeah, probably coz it might be a running total so far and we might be forgetting the reductions to the best 18.

        0

        2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *