I gambled last weekend, not satisfied with 116 from GAJ, i flicked the C over to Scott Pendlebury and paid the price … if anything, i should have given it to Swanny – but hindsight’s a beautiful thing.
So, this week i’ll hit GAJ up with the VC on Saturday and use Swan as my fall back on Sunday.
Who’s getting the job done for you? You can pick 2 of these blokes.
Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.0
0
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Chucking the VC on Joelwood and using GAJ as my back up.
With only McBean, Birchall and Nicholls missing (so far), I can really only loophole the Geelong players into GAJ. So thinking the VC on Joelwood.
selwood into ablett for mine
GAJ (vc) into Swan (c), if the little master breaks 140 it’s his, if not Swanny will don the big C.
Since 2011,
Selwood v Kangers has gone 140, 140 & 126…….ave 135.3
Bartel v Kangers has gone 157, 102 & 112………..ave 123.6
Stevie J just played the 1 game & got a dismal……60
Pendles v Essendon has gone 136, 125, 140, 160 &130….ave 138.2
Swanny v Essendon has gone 127, 175, 180, 176 & 106….ave 152.8
Watson v Pies has gone 126, 126, 93, 119 & 90………………ave 110.8
Swans looking like the obvious choice for me this round, that’s if you can utilize the loophole of course 🙂
Ablett into Swan or Pendlebury for me. Likely Swan. Hocking will go to Pendlebury (which will likely have little effect) but Swan is always allowed to run free.
Stevie Jay (VC) ➡ Beams/Pendles (C)
T/U Stevie j VC – GAJ C
T/D GAJ VC- Swan C
T/U – Selwood (VC) to GAJ (C)
T/D – GAJ (VC) to Swan (C)
GAJ into Swan
J. Selwood into Swan.
Concerned that S. Selwood will be all over GAJ