Both play for premiership contenders who use the ball a lot. Dale’s had a breakout year increasing $88k in price to $481k. Daniel hasn’t performed as well to date as he did last year, dropping $15k to $434k. They’re both averaging in the mid-90′s. Who do you like more?
No related posts.








{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
I normally would vote for the bloke in my team, but on this occasion, I’ve gone with Daisy, although I do have him in my DT.
Gia has scored really well, when particular blokes have been out, Higgins recently and Boyd -I think- earlier this year.
He hasn’t been nearly as good in his other games, and the challenge for him is to perform week in week out when Higgins comes back.
Daisy has been an ultra consistent as I mentioned in a recent post. Everything between 80-133 apart from a 68 & a 70 is pretty reliable.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
gia is one reason why the doggies are up and down this year.. maybe the coach has something to do with that , by playing him in the forward line in some of the games.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Maybe Hall’s prescence has caused the Doggies to become too Hall focussed.
Maybe the Doggies are being bogged down by thinking about their footy too much instead of just playing.
Maybe the Doggies have got ahead of themselves and think it will all just happen for them.
Maybe there are internal divisions causing rifts and problems.
Maybe the Doggies are timing their run well and will get better and better.
Tomorrow night is important, b/c the Doggies prob don’t wanna finish 5th and have to go to Perth to play Freo.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
maybe the doggies are kidding themselves to be top 4 …hehehe .they should beat hawthorn this week .
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe and maybe.
Time will tell boyz.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
yeah thats right pa , too many maybe,s and not enough will be,s
Like or Dislike:
0
0
No such thing as a “will be” in footy. Freo and Richmond of previous few weeks are proof
Like or Dislike:
0
0
only if you had a crystal ball.
Like or Dislike:
0
0