2021 Midfield Projections Group 1
Lachie Neale
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2012 | 11 | 47.4 | 18 | |
2013 | 9 | 86.9 | 19 | |
2014 | 21 | 87.2 | 20 | |
2015 | 22 | 104.3 | 21 | |
2016 | 22 | 112.6 | 22 | 113 |
2017 | 21 | 109 | 23 | 114 |
2018 | 22 | 111.9 | 24 | 115 |
2019 | 22 | 121.3 | 25 | 120 |
2020 | 17 | 134.4 | 26 | 120 |
118-128 | 120 |
Pretty much ceiling priced. Hard to imagine he does much better and pretty likely not to do as well. Still, he is a captain option even if he has a year like 2019. He is only 27, which means there should be no age related decline. I really, really wish I knew what he would have average in a normal season, since I can’t really use the data from 2020 in my :who is likely to go Super-premium calculations.
Jackson Macrae
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2013 | 13 | 61.4 | 18 | |
2014 | 21 | 100.1 | 19 | |
2015 | 20 | 99.9 | 20 | |
2016 | 18 | 94.1 | 21 | |
2017 | 22 | 106.9 | 22 | |
2018 | 19 | 127.1 | 23 | 125 |
2019 | 22 | 123.2 | 24 | 125 |
2020 | 17 | 121 | 25 | 125 |
118-128 | 125 |
I think he is actually floor priced, since he is just 26 and is priced at his lowest average in 3 years. Way more upside than downside. I mean anyone at 121 has a lot of possible downside, just not a lot of likely downside. I suspect the dogs will be good, and they will have enough points to spread around to not need to avoid their mids. At least their best ones; Bailey Smith could be in trouble.
Clayton Oliver
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2016 | 13 | 70.3 | 18 | |
2017 | 22 | 111.5 | 19 | 111 |
2018 | 22 | 114.7 | 20 | 112 |
2019 | 22 | 109.4 | 21 | 113 |
2020 | 17 | 122.2 | 22 | 118 |
118-130+ | 120 |
Satan Oliver is 23. That’s the age it is most likely for a player to make the jump to super premium. As I said in the past, I can’t really use the data from last year for those calculations, but a 13 point increase is not likely all due to the short quarters. I actually think he is floor priced as well. At worst he is accurately priced. I feel like he has been good for so long it is hard to remember how young he is, and that he still hasn’t played 100 matches. Ok, 96, but still not even 100. If I didn’t own him and he did break out into a super premium this year, I would have an Embolism, so I own him. He is also durable, having not missed a match in 4 years.
Nathan Fyfe
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2010 | 16 | 72.6 | 18 | |
2011 | 21 | 108 | 19 | |
2012 | 9 | 93.2 | 20 | |
2013 | 19 | 106.5 | 21 | |
2014 | 18 | 122.3 | 22 | 122 |
2015 | 18 | 124.3 | 23 | 122 |
2016 | 5 | 105.4 | 24 | 121 |
2017 | 21 | 108.8 | 25 | 121 |
2018 | 15 | 113.9 | 26 | 119 |
2019 | 20 | 120 | 27 | 117 |
2020 | 14 | 113.2 | 28 | 115 |
109-118 | 113 |
Fyfe is one of those players who somehow feels better than he is, at least in Supercoach. Last year he said he would be forward more and he was. This year, there is no reason I know of that he will go back into the guts and so I think he is accurately priced. He also misses a lot of matches. He missed games every year. The only place a 22 appears in those numbers is his 2014 age. Will he play his first full season at 29? Possible, but not probable. If you are a Dockers fan who can’t handle games without him in your side, I understand. Otherwise he should not be in your team.
Joshua Kelly
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2014 | 18 | 68.1 | 18 | |
2015 | 18 | 70.6 | 19 | |
2016 | 22 | 87.1 | 20 | |
2017 | 21 | 114.3 | 21 | 114 |
2018 | 15 | 113.8 | 22 | 114 |
2019 | 14 | 117.4 | 23 | 114 |
2020 | 14 | 114.6 | 24 | 114 |
110-118 | 114 |
Jelly is sort of like a Fyfe who never actually averaged 120+, although he did once play 22 games in a season back in 2016. I can understand the Fyfe hope, after all Nat hit 120+ 3 times, and he is 29, so it is still possible if not probable. At 25, there is still a possibility of a Jelly breakout, but he has had about the same average for 4 seasons in a row, and he has missed 29% of the games in the last 3 years. If you are thinking of picking him, find $5,300 and take Zac Merrett instead. If you have Zac, find $8,300 and take The Bont instead. If you have both of them, well, Macrae and Oliver are next. If you can’t go up, try Danger, who is at least durable. Better yet, try for someone floor priced who might go for about 114 but cost far less! Again, GWS fans are forgiven for having him despite all the reasons not to. Everyone else, why?
Patrick Cripps
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2014 | 3 | 39.3 | 18 | |
2015 | 20 | 96.3 | 19 | |
2016 | 21 | 107.6 | 20 | |
2017 | 15 | 97.7 | 21 | |
2018 | 22 | 119.4 | 22 | 118 |
2019 | 20 | 117.1 | 23 | 118 |
2020 | 17 | 97.5 | 24 | 118 |
111-121 | 118 |
Well, I think he is pretty much floor priced. (Jelly owners take note) I’d expect him to get back at least 10 points of the 20 he dropped last year. As many others have said, he won’t have to carry the team all by himself, and that should reduce wear and tear on his body. He’s an obvious fallen premium and seems like a bargain.
Marcus Bontempelli
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2014 | 16 | 78.6 | 18 | |
2015 | 20 | 103.2 | 19 | 104 |
2016 | 22 | 107.7 | 20 | 106 |
2017 | 22 | 105.1 | 21 | 108 |
2018 | 19 | 104 | 22 | 110 |
2019 | 22 | 114.7 | 23 | 113 |
17 | 116.1 | 24 | 115 | |
112-122 | 116 |
I think he is priced about accurately, although he is also just 25 and could break out. He shows signs of it often enough. He is durable and that’s always nice. If picking one of him or Macrae I would go with Jack. Last year he and the Dogs were terrible the first part of the year and darn good the second part, and if they can avoid that inexplicable run of suck he could easily break out. But that may be wishful thinking as the numbers do not clearly point to it.
Thanks for Reading!
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Once more GOLDfrom FD Taking your advice on macrae DD
All pretty accurate too me. Accept for cripps, he looked dreadful against essendon and St Kilda. I know you can’t read into pre season too much but following last year he doesn’t give me heaps of hope
If Carlton haven’t broken him, he’s good for a 15-20 point increase.
Cripps played fwd due to having stuff all Tall fwds they lost McKay in the first quarter both games and having only McDonald and a Moore, Jsos named Cripps got a better defender than he would have if Carltons key talls were playing Ie McKay and Casbault.
Can we start Walsh and Rowell at M4&5?
Is that too light? Should we have a proven uber at M4? My M1,2&3 is Neale Oliver and Merrett
That’s a fine set up imo, and I’m going for something similar. You’re better off going 2/3 uber premos and then taking a couple punts on some undervalued guys who may break out and then being able to spread that extra cash around your team. Walsh and Rowell are pretty good picks as well and could very likely average 105+, so it’s not a super risky proposition. I back it.