32 thoughts on “Table for Two – Round 2”

  1. To be bold … or conservative

    T/U Fisher & Young to Serong & Billings
    T/D Fisher & Gibcus to Billings & Massimo

    Comment: Do nothing and wait a week

    0
    0
    Reply
  2. TU: fyfe
    TD: Billings

    Fyfe looks to have a dream inside mid role..
    Trying to stay away from Billings hype. He had 15 marks to inflate his score.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • Looking long term i would imagine Heeney’s scoring takes a hit when Parker and Adams come back in, so based off that i would lean towards Flanders.

      0
      0
      Reply
  3. Can I ask why their is an overwhelming support for the Billings pick over fyfe?
    Fyfe has 1 less bye, a solid first game of 103 and a substantially better role? Are people just waiting a week for the bubble? I much prefer he over Billings.

    Would love others thoughts

    0
    0
    Reply
    • Maybe, like me, Manny may already have Fyfe in which case Billings is a good option as is Berry..
      In addition, I could be wrong, Billings won’t be the sub again after his RD1 performance..
      BE 5, will make probs 100k..

      0
      0
      Reply
  4. Gibcus replacement. Deciding between these two (will look at Coffield next week potentially).

    TU: Uwland (on bubble, average scoring but good JS?).
    TD: Hore (going early, better scoring but less JS, or is his JS ok?).

    0
    0
    Reply
  5. TU or TD – Strongly considering this move to make up for the last round & gain some points moving forward,

    ~ Sicily > Sheezel
    ~ Williams > Coffield
    ~ Lyons > Henney

    Williams & Lyons were just cash cows, not terrible scores, Sheezel & Heeney at at present appear to be D6/F6 keepers at worst plus points, potentially better.

    0
    0
    Reply
  6. Have already done 2 trades : Fisher and Lazaro out for Flanders and T Berry. Do I use a boost?

    TU – N Nartin to Miller
    TD – N Martin to Heeney

    Content to hold with no 3rd trade.

    0
    0
    Reply

Leave a Comment