Small or Far Away, Father Dougal on Cows
Hi Everybody!
Why is the Hamster striking a pose?
Is he wearing…hose?
Twenty Three, or not Twenty Three, that is the question.
Whether ’tis nobler in weekly score to suffer
The shoulders and hamstrings of outrageous fortune,
Or to trade away against a sea of troubles
And by ignoring cash generation. To fade—to score,
No more; and by low scores to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand disappointments
That Supercoach is heir to: ’tis a conundrum
Ok, wow, well done!
Yes Indeed, I shall now fetch a purse of Pumpkin seeds.
(Happy squeaks and munching)
So, this week, rather epic, and not just because of the soliloquy.
Yeah, all those plans? Perhaps a bit disrupted.
Yup Yup Yup.
So, I feel obliged to talk about that, at least some.
Even though you have no special insights and there are other people on the site probably better qualified to suggest what to do?
Yeah, because I am going to avoid suggesting specific actions, and stick to pointing out a few things to keep in mind when making decisions. For example, as the Hamster has so eloquently pointed out, we still want to get to 23 premiums.
Cash generation has been difficult.
RIght, so while there is a very understandable desire to change everything because of all the injuries, I think that, well, don’t panic. Like ok, we all have to double check the byes. For sure have 18 players for each bye. But, that does not mean giving up on cash generation, because that is still very important, and it does not mean stop spending money wisely and looking for value.
How about the don’t sideways premiums principle?
Well, long term injuries are the big exception. But, how many of these injuries are really long term? Do we know? A three week injury with a bye in the middle is just two missed weeks. Maybe not worth a trade. A lot depends on who you are bringing in and why. Do you think you can get a much better player for less, or not much more, for someone who wasn’t going to be top in the line anyways? Are you too short on trades to spend any on someone who will be a good enough scorer when they return?
So, once again, tie down the knee?
Right. So much for the old plan, time for a new plan, which may be same as the old plan. The same premiums are falling, the same cows are ripe, the same cows are ready to bring in.
But, the speech thing?
Ok, he is very right, that if we are going to get to 23 premiums and complete our teams, we need to plan and think and not just splash the cash now that a few guys are hurt and could be sold for big money. It is very tempting to go on a spending spree when cash appears, or to trade away like we won;t miss those trades later, but ignoring cash generation, both by bad player choices and being short on trades, well, those can end up killing a season, even if that does not become clear until long after the money is spent and the trades are used.
Defenders
Z Reid: At least one more week
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 119,900 | |||
1 | 45 | 119,900 | ||
2 | 36 | 119,900 | ||
3 | 88 | 119,900 | ||
4 | 163,100 | |||
5 | 104 | 163,100 | ||
6 | 38 | 220,700 | ||
7 | 90 | 264,700 | ||
8 | 102 | 298,400 | ||
9 | 133 | 322,700 | ||
10 | 75 | 382,100 | ||
11 | 79.0 | 418,700 | ||
12 | 79.0 | 436,327 | 17,627 | 17,627 |
13 | 79.0 | 425,523 | -10,804 | 6,823 |
14 | 79.0 | 419,299 | -6,224 | 599 |
15 | 79.0 | 414,697 | -4,602 | -4,003 |
16 |
Trainor: I would be tempted to hold for another spike score, but it is not wrong to cull him.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 133,500 | |||
1 | 50 | 133,500 | ||
2 | 24 | 133,500 | ||
3 | 90 | 133,500 | ||
4 | 82 | 156,200 | ||
5 | 80 | 201,400 | ||
6 | 2 | 259,500 | ||
7 | 66 | 264,200 | ||
8 | 82 | 260,800 | ||
9 | 46 | 259,500 | ||
10 | 52 | 277,400 | ||
11 | 57.4 | 284,100 | ||
12 | 57.4 | 278,694 | -5,406 | -5,406 |
13 | 57.4 | 279,729 | 1,035 | -4,371 |
14 | ||||
15 | 57.4 | 282,879 | 3,149 | -1,221 |
16 | 57.4 | 285,207 | 2,329 | 1,107 |
Prior: At least one more week
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 169,200 | |||
1 | 50 | 169,200 | ||
2 | 57 | 169,200 | ||
3 | 78 | 169,200 | ||
4 | 163,100 | |||
5 | 54 | 163,100 | ||
6 | 92 | 235,500 | ||
7 | 43 | 273,000 | ||
8 | 57 | 285,500 | ||
9 | 93 | 296,300 | ||
10 | 69 | 304,200 | ||
11 | 65.9 | 321,100 | ||
12 | 65.9 | 338,056 | 16,956 | 16,956 |
13 | 65.9 | 338,627 | 571 | 17,527 |
14 | 65.9 | 337,676 | -951 | 16,576 |
15 | 65.9 | 336,973 | -703 | 15,873 |
16 |
Bice: Want him on field, and very likely has another spike score in him.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 113,500 | |||
1 | 52 | 113,500 | ||
2 | 96 | 113,500 | ||
3 | 113,500 | |||
4 | 124 | 113,500 | ||
5 | 89 | 203,400 | ||
6 | 79 | 286,100 | ||
7 | 101 | 340,400 | ||
8 | 49 | 370,800 | ||
9 | 71 | 375,800 | ||
10 | 55 | 375,300 | ||
11 | 79.6 | 354,100 | ||
12 | 79.6 | 352,601 | -1,499 | -1,499 |
13 | 79.6 | 355,269 | 2,668 | 1,169 |
14 | ||||
15 | 79.6 | 368,082 | 12,813 | 13,982 |
16 | 79.6 | 377,558 | 9,475 | 23,458 |
Connor O’Sullivan: Either sell now or sell much later when and if he makes the cash back.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 148,700 | |||
1 | 48 | 148,700 | ||
2 | 88 | 148,700 | ||
3 | 77 | 148,700 | ||
4 | 103 | 203,900 | ||
5 | 42 | 268,200 | ||
6 | 54 | 295,400 | ||
7 | 95 | 306,400 | ||
8 | 48 | 310,500 | ||
9 | 49 | 317,300 | ||
10 | 26 | 319,300 | ||
11 | 63.0 | 289,800 | ||
12 | 63.0 | 275,228 | -14,572 | -14,572 |
13 | 63.0 | 270,632 | -4,596 | -19,168 |
14 | 63.0 | 283,568 | 12,935 | -6,232 |
15 | 63.0 | 293,134 | 9,566 | 3,334 |
16 |
Midfielders
M Reid: Stopped the bleeding. No idea what is up with him
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 131,500 | |||
1 | 50 | 131,500 | ||
2 | 75 | 131,500 | ||
3 | 106 | 131,500 | ||
4 | 73 | 199,100 | ||
5 | 58 | 258,500 | ||
6 | 82 | 294,900 | ||
7 | 35 | 312,000 | ||
8 | 50 | 308,200 | ||
9 | 36 | 302,000 | ||
10 | 69 | 276,500 | ||
11 | 63.4 | 272,400 | ||
12 | 63.4 | 275,781 | 3,381 | 3,381 |
13 | ||||
14 | 63.4 | 290,377 | 14,596 | 17,977 |
15 | 63.4 | 298,699 | 8,322 | 26,299 |
16 | 63.4 | 304,853 | 6,154 | 32,453 |
Lindsay: Looks like one more week and reevaluate.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 158,500 | |||
1 | 86 | 158,500 | ||
2 | 78 | 158,500 | ||
3 | 9 | 158,500 | ||
4 | 193,400 | |||
5 | 48 | 193,400 | ||
6 | 55 | 202,000 | ||
7 | 78 | 198,700 | ||
8 | 56 | 227,000 | ||
9 | 71 | 251,700 | ||
10 | 67 | 276,500 | ||
11 | 60.9 | 289,600 | ||
12 | 60.9 | 301,960 | 12,360 | 12,360 |
13 | 60.9 | 306,636 | 4,677 | 17,036 |
14 | 60.9 | 307,397 | 761 | 17,797 |
15 | ||||
16 | 60.9 | 307,959 | 562 | 18,359 |
Moraes: No idea if he has a job or not now.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 113,500 | |||
1 | 113,500 | |||
2 | 52 | 113,500 | ||
3 | 94 | 113,500 | ||
4 | 43 | 113,500 | ||
5 | 42 | 166,800 | ||
6 | 30 | 201,800 | ||
7 | 55 | 199,900 | ||
8 | 204,100 | |||
9 | 24 | 204,100 | ||
10 | 68 | 198,900 | ||
11 | 51.0 | 211,600 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 51.0 | 219,606 | 8,006 | 8,006 |
14 | 51.0 | 237,446 | 17,840 | 25,846 |
15 | 51.0 | 243,134 | 5,688 | 31,534 |
16 | 51.0 | 247,341 | 4,206 | 35,741 |
Lalor: Probably hold to his bye
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 203,500 | |||
1 | 74 | 203,500 | ||
2 | 39 | 203,500 | ||
3 | 45 | 203,500 | ||
4 | 112 | 220,759 | ||
5 | 248,300 | |||
6 | 70 | 248,300 | ||
7 | 46 | 283,800 | ||
8 | 46 | 310,700 | ||
9 | 61 | 301,700 | ||
10 | 79 | 290,500 | ||
11 | 63.6 | 296,400 | ||
12 | 63.6 | 309,049 | 12,649 | 18,549 |
13 | 63.6 | 319,530 | 10,482 | 29,030 |
14 | ||||
15 | 63.6 | 320,464 | 933 | 29,964 |
16 | 63.6 | 321,154 | 690 | 30,654 |
Long: He’s not really a cow, looks much more like a good midpricer. Probably one of if not the last person to upgrade.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 30 | 200,900 | ||
1 | 113 | 200,900 | ||
2 | 57 | 200,900 | ||
3 | 240,000 | |||
4 | 26 | 240,000 | ||
5 | 114 | 263,000 | ||
6 | 96 | 280,600 | ||
7 | 87 | 311,600 | ||
8 | 94 | 361,900 | ||
9 | 65 | 390,100 | ||
10 | 94 | 397,500 | ||
11 | 77.6 | 404,600 | ||
12 | 77.6 | 403,650 | -950 | -950 |
13 | 77.6 | 408,510 | 4,860 | 3,910 |
14 | ||||
15 | 77.6 | 404,864 | -3,646 | 264 |
16 | 77.6 | 402,168 | -2,696 | -2,432 |
Gross: Hold until he has made money. He seems too good to be held down for a long time. Well, he plays for the Eagles, so, maybe they will find a way.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 113,500 | |||
1 | 113,500 | |||
2 | 113,500 | |||
3 | 113,500 | |||
4 | 51 | 113,500 | ||
5 | 82 | 113,500 | ||
6 | 11 | 113,500 | ||
7 | 147,500 | |||
8 | 147,500 | |||
9 | 46 | 147,500 | ||
10 | 42 | 170,400 | ||
11 | 46.4 | 169,400 | ||
12 | 46.4 | 184,603 | 15,203 | 15,203 |
13 | 46.4 | 196,022 | 11,419 | 26,622 |
14 | 46.4 | 206,409 | 10,387 | 37,009 |
15 | ||||
16 | 46.4 | 214,090 | 7,681 | 44,690 |
Rucks
Flynn: Hold now, nice game. Paid off for his holders.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 261,900 | |||
1 | 87 | 261,900 | ||
2 | 261,900 | |||
3 | 261,900 | |||
4 | 261,900 | |||
5 | 261,900 | |||
6 | 141 | 261,900 | ||
7 | 105 | 261,900 | ||
8 | 53 | 341,100 | ||
9 | 80 | 384,900 | ||
10 | 111 | 389,500 | ||
11 | 96.2 | 395,000 | ||
12 | 96.2 | 418,874 | 23,874 | 23,874 |
13 | 96.2 | 443,666 | 24,792 | 48,666 |
14 | 96.2 | 455,451 | 11,785 | 60,451 |
15 | ||||
16 | 96.2 | 464,166 | 8,715 | 69,166 |
Forwards
Hugo Garcia: Well, without Jack, he might do better. I’d want to see before dumping him.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 245,800 | |||
1 | 54 | 245,800 | ||
2 | 25 | 245,800 | ||
3 | 99 | 245,800 | ||
4 | 54 | 260,000 | ||
5 | 84 | 269,800 | ||
6 | 59 | 303,300 | ||
7 | 21 | 311,100 | ||
8 | 71 | 302,600 | ||
9 | 40 | 290,800 | ||
10 | 60 | 273,200 | ||
11 | 56.7 | 277,000 | ||
12 | 56.7 | 274,018 | -2,982 | -2,982 |
13 | ||||
14 | 56.7 | 279,185 | 5,167 | 2,185 |
15 | 56.7 | 281,549 | 2,364 | 4,549 |
16 | 56.7 | 283,297 | 1,748 | 6,297 |
Levi Ashcroft: I feel like he is too good on field to trade before his bye, but cows are for cash, so, well, use if you need to.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 185,500 | |||
1 | 84 | 185,500 | ||
2 | 72 | 185,500 | ||
3 | 36 | 185,500 | ||
4 | 87 | 221,700 | ||
5 | 90 | 249,100 | ||
6 | 89 | 277,400 | ||
7 | 68 | 322,500 | ||
8 | 99 | 347,800 | ||
9 | 77 | 370,800 | ||
10 | 68 | 381,800 | ||
11 | 77.0 | 389,300 | ||
12 | 77.0 | 385,891 | -3,409 | -3,409 |
13 | 77.0 | 383,369 | -2,521 | -5,931 |
14 | 77.0 | 385,478 | 2,109 | -3,822 |
15 | 77.0 | 387,037 | 1,559 | -2,263 |
16 |
Davidson: ANyone owning him, well, I expect waiting for another spike score. He has a job, and that’s a big thing now.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 113,500 | |||
1 | 39 | 113,500 | ||
2 | 72 | 113,500 | ||
3 | 129 | 113,500 | ||
4 | 54 | 189,800 | ||
5 | 61 | 252,100 | ||
6 | 82 | 293,200 | ||
7 | 51 | 303,700 | ||
8 | 46 | 310,400 | ||
9 | 55 | 309,000 | ||
10 | 58 | 295,400 | ||
11 | 64.7 | 288,000 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 64.7 | 291,423 | 3,423 | 3,423 |
14 | 64.7 | 298,236 | 6,813 | 10,236 |
15 | 64.7 | 306,232 | 7,996 | 18,232 |
16 | 64.7 | 312,145 | 5,913 | 24,145 |
Kako: Has a job, has DPP, Has Job Has DPP, Warm body in the byes, warm body in the byes, but looks like he will never make money. He will some day, but man, he so rarely puts up a score that you want on field. I was expecting to give up on him, but he may be a needed warm body, and he can;t lose too much cash, knock on wood. Another I feel you get rid of now or hold to his bye.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 149,500 | |||
1 | 62 | 149,500 | ||
2 | 34 | 149,500 | ||
3 | 62 | 149,500 | ||
4 | 163,100 | |||
5 | 38 | 163,100 | ||
6 | 55 | 191,700 | ||
7 | 49 | 210,200 | ||
8 | 60 | 218,300 | ||
9 | 30 | 234,200 | ||
10 | 32 | 234,500 | ||
11 | 46.9 | 226,900 | ||
12 | 46.9 | 215,862 | -11,038 | -11,038 |
13 | 46.9 | 215,155 | -707 | -11,745 |
14 | 46.9 | 221,206 | 6,050 | -5,694 |
15 | 46.9 | 225,680 | 4,474 | -1,220 |
16 |
Sam PP: No rush either way now.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 180,500 | |||
1 | 18 | 180,500 | ||
2 | 83 | 180,500 | ||
3 | 48 | 180,500 | ||
4 | 74 | 199,000 | ||
5 | 101 | 236,800 | ||
6 | 106 | 272,700 | ||
7 | 98 | 325,700 | ||
8 | 66 | 375,800 | ||
9 | 53 | 397,700 | ||
10 | 89 | 389,700 | ||
11 | 73.6 | 379,300 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 73.6 | 375,670 | -3,630 | -3,630 |
14 | 73.6 | 382,080 | 6,410 | 2,780 |
15 | 73.6 | 380,022 | -2,058 | 722 |
16 | 73.6 | 378,500 | -1,522 | -800 |
Stone: Did not play.
Curtain: Well, warm body, playing, did score much better last week.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 158,600 | |||
1 | 26 | 158,600 | ||
2 | 82 | 158,600 | ||
3 | 90 | 158,600 | ||
4 | 65 | 204,500 | ||
5 | 42 | 254,900 | ||
6 | 48 | 274,600 | ||
7 | 41 | 271,400 | ||
8 | 73 | 258,700 | ||
9 | 22 | 263,200 | ||
10 | 65 | 254,600 | ||
11 | 55.4 | 258,400 | ||
12 | 55.4 | 253,950 | -4,450 | -4,450 |
13 | 55.4 | 265,404 | 11,454 | 7,004 |
14 | 55.4 | 269,636 | 4,232 | 11,236 |
15 | ||||
16 | 55.4 | 272,766 | 3,130 | 14,366 |
Dodgy Advice: Connor Simpson and Shai Bolton. Simpson is as good a cow as we are going to get. Bolton, despite being Shai Bolton, has both short and long term potential, and is very cheap.
What I tell you three (or more) times is true! Do not overpay for anyone. So many good players with falling or low prices.
Remember the Cow Talk guarantee: “All predictions wrong or triple your money back!” (Offer not valid if money is actually involved.)
I am time zonally challenged. When Cow Talk goes live, I’m probably asleep, so replies from me may take a while.
Thanks for reading!