Dangerfield’s out for three. That means a lot of people are going to trade him out. But to whom?
Loading ... Loading ...9
0
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Polls: Dangerfield Replacements
Loading ... Loading ...Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Mitchell
Tom Mitchell in the mids
Callum Mills in defence via DPP
Isaac Heeney a possibility with Bud returning this week and Gulden kicking 3… does this mean more mid time for Heeney maybe?
Martin the obvious choice perhaps
Would like Mitchell but would leave me with around 14k in the bank.
Rookies are good, Only missing Jordon, but 14k is a concern if rookies aren’t named.
So;
TU: Mitchell
TD: Z Williams $165k in bank
Comment: Stewart $85k in bank
Have Lloyd, Laird, Daniel, Mills, Clarke in defence already.
Comment
TU: Stewart
TD: Boak + 33k in bank
I like Stewart
All depends on your structure, and how many rookies you’re playing on-field on each line.
Assuming you only had 2 FWD premiums, it would be best to stick with a ‘like for like’ FWD swap (Dunkley / Dusty).
Thanks David
Danger is currently in my mids
Rookies on field
Def: Highmore
Mids: Powell, Campbell, Gulden
Fwd: Dow, Rowe, Scott.
I have Dunkley and Phillips at F1/F2
In that case, assuming you still have another F/M link, then sideways him to a premium MID that you’re keen on.
Leaving yourself with only $14k is a risk, so aim a bit cheaper than Mitchell. Maybe Walsh?
I’d love to bring in Titch via DPP but that would mean Dusty/Ziebell and then four rookies in FWD. Straight swap to Dunkley seems a bit safer then.
TU – Titch
TD – Dunkley
Yep, Ziebell @ F2 seems too much of a stretch. Go straight to Dunkley.
that is the incorrect way to look at it – either way you have the same number of rookies playing.
if you bring in Titch and had three rookies in the mids, now you have two and the other way, you had three fwd rookies, now you have four.
It’s still six rookies in total playing. Ziebell can really almost be classed as a premo … he should still virtually finish in the top forwards regardless …
The issue may well be that the ones playing as forward rookies may not score as high as the one you leave out of the mids … but then, if you expect titch to outscore Dunkley, then does that compensate?
The other factor to consider is your bye structure … and maximising points across the three bye rounds … if playing OA … if not, not as important.
“The issue may well be that the ones playing as forward rookies may not score as high as the one you leave out of the mids … but then, if you expect titch to outscore Dunkley, then does that compensate?”
Have to disagree with this part. No, one premium outscoring the other doesn’t compensate the lost points from a MID vs FWD rookie, because you’re also getting extra cash from Dunkley instead of Mitchell (to spend elsewhere).
Also, it’sa scenario that will potentially last for multiple weeks. Unlikely people will be ADDING extra premiums for at least 4-5 rounds, so you’re basically stuck with your F7 becoming your new F6 for a while, as opposed to your M9 becoming your new M8 for a while. If this scenario isn’t a big negative for you, then go for it.
Appreciate the dialogue.
I’ve got the Danger Rowell combo. Looking at swapping them for Dusty and Boak.
Wanted to go Walsh instead of Boak, but have too many premos out for the middle bye already, whereas Boak has the nice early bye. Titch would’ve been preferred too, but was 10k short.
TU: Boak and Mills
TD: Boak and dunkley
mills and dunkley – personally I dont trust boak … then again, Dunkley is also a risk due to his coach …
IMO as a Swanneez man i would not be risking playing Buddy just yet – 1 more week hardworking practice game maybe, we won without him.
If Heeney goes on ball, that will affect Millsy.
Millsy will then cop the blame for being inconsistant.
…..but i suppose we probably paid 10 mil for him to advertise the club we should get some headlines other than his personal ones.
Thoughts on Danger/NCox to Butters/Caldwell?
A bit mid pricey but would send Ziebell to F4 (Dusty F1) and Caldwell looked good until half-time when all of ESS went to $hite.
TU – Yes
TD – No
Anyone that watched the Bombers on the weekend, is Caldwell an option? If he can average 90 which is definitely achievable then he would be good enough for F6.
Misso is Bombers I’m Hawks and was her bday, made for a good watch.
He looked good, but a lot of the bombers did against us at times. Had a fair few tackles and got a fair bit of the pill
Think the role he’s been given is very favourable too. Can definitely see an 85 average this year
He is fine. Def not going to put up a stinker and his game is contested and tackles. Should only be looked at as a safe stepping stone, but its easy to upgrade a$35ok regular.
Disclaimer…I have him.
Thinking of danger to Walsh and Rowell to ziebell. Bank some $$ for rookie correction next week m
Def in my 2-3 options currently considering.
No love for Jack Graham??
TU: Mitchell
TD: Mills
comment below for Brayshaw
for danger
TU/D: Brayshaw
other options above
Bring in
Tu mitchell
Td dusty
Dangers replacement
Danger —> Sidebottom
TU: Yes
TD: No
Would appreciate any insight from Collingwood fans as to how they see Steeles season unfolding, understand the risks with his age and the injury, however I’m also seeing a struggling Collingwood midfield (with the loss of treloar) that could use his talent, lots of midfield time to come for Steele or steer clear?
Rowell – Mills (Laird via DPP)
Danger – Zorko
80k left in bank
was going to do Mitchell and Dunkley as in’s but was 10k short
2nd thought:
Rowell to Mitchell
Danger to Zorko
TU: Danger = Titch
TD: Danger / Henry = Ziebell / Z.Williams via DPP
TU: OLIVER
TD: TMITCH
TU FYFE
TD BOAK
To get in for danger:
Tu: mills
TD: Brayshaw
Trading Dangerfield
I’ve got Martin, Dunkley, Cripps (unfortunately)
Gunning for a star Mid
T/U – Mitchell
T/D – Oliver
Comment for anyone else eg Boak, Neale, Bont