Hi Everybody!
Standard warning, blah, made up , balh blah blah
Adam Treloar
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2012 | 18 | 83.2 | 18 | |
2013 | 20 | 87 | 19 | |
2014 | 20 | 107.5 | 20 | 107 |
2015 | 21 | 106.8 | 21 | 108 |
2016 | 22 | 111.3 | 22 | 109 |
2017 | 21 | 101.4 | 23 | 109 |
2018 | 13 | 109.5 | 24 | 109 |
2019 | 22 | 113.4 | 25 | 109 |
2020 | 8 | 109.4 | 26 | 109 |
106-115 | 109 |
Adam has been pretty much the same player for a while, with pretty moderate variations. He is priced accurately and will probably about what he did before. Being a Bulldog might agree with him, so a higher average wouldn’t be a shock. It is also possible that he’ll somehow drop from all the dogs fighting for points, but that’s something that doesn’t seem to happen in practice much.
Zachary Merrett
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2014 | 19 | 63.7 | 18 | |
2015 | 17 | 88.5 | 19 | |
2016 | 22 | 111.5 | 20 | 108 |
2017 | 21 | 109.2 | 21 | 108 |
2018 | 22 | 100.4 | 22 | 108 |
2019 | 22 | 105.6 | 23 | 108 |
2020 | 16 | 115.6 | 24 | 112 |
111-121 | 116 |
At 25 he could once again improve on his average. I can’t say he is floor priced, that’s awfully optimistic, but I think at worse he is accurately priced with a better than normal chance to break out. Every time I take him out of my team I regret it and put him back in. From the little we know of the new rules, they seem to suit him.
Andrew Gaff
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2011 | 14 | 61.1 | 18 | |
2012 | 22 | 90.4 | 19 | |
2013 | 22 | 71.1 | 20 | |
2014 | 22 | 87.9 | 21 | |
2015 | 22 | 103.8 | 22 | 103 |
2016 | 21 | 90.7 | 23 | 104 |
2017 | 22 | 93.1 | 24 | 105 |
2018 | 19 | 108.2 | 25 | 106 |
2019 | 20 | 107.4 | 26 | 107 |
2020 | 17 | 106.2 | 27 | 107 |
104-110 | 107 |
At 28, we know just who he is and he might be the definition of accurately priced. The big knock on him is lack of upside, and why go with him when so many others have more upside for about the same price?
Scott Pendlebury
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2006 | 9 | 56.8 | 18 | |
2007 | 20 | 88.7 | 19 | |
2008 | 21 | 103.5 | 20 | |
2009 | 20 | 106.5 | 21 | |
2010 | 22 | 110.5 | 22 | |
2011 | 22 | 129.2 | 23 | 125 |
2012 | 18 | 124.7 | 24 | 125 |
2013 | 22 | 126.6 | 25 | 125 |
2014 | 21 | 124.4 | 26 | 125 |
2015 | 22 | 116.2 | 27 | 120 |
2016 | 22 | 118.7 | 28 | 115 |
2017 | 16 | 106.7 | 29 | 110 |
2018 | 21 | 103.5 | 30 | 107 |
2019 | 22 | 104.3 | 31 | 104 |
2020 | 13 | 110.2 | 32 | 103 |
100-110 | 102 |
He is 33 and just has his highest score since 2017. He’s climbing through the ceiling to the roof, and either way is a terrible choice. Playing Frogger at an advanced level now, he has a date with a beer truck coming soon. Gary held his average from 32 to 33, and then dropped hard every year after. Pendles could do the same but he also might go a year sooner, since while Scotty was great, Gary was even better. Even Pies fans should be avoiding him this year.
Matt Crouch
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2014 | 8 | 59.2 | 18 | |
2015 | 15 | 68.3 | 19 | |
2016 | 20 | 92.8 | 20 | |
2017 | 22 | 110.6 | 21 | 105 |
2018 | 18 | 101.6 | 22 | 105 |
2019 | 19 | 103.7 | 23 | 105 |
2020 | 16 | 110.7 | 24 | 106 |
103-113 | 107 |
History says he is ceiling priced, although I’m thinking he might be closer to accurately priced. But either way he has good risk of being himself again, and unless you think being at the Crows will somehow make him better than he was, faster, stronger, well, why?
Stephen Coniglio
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2012 | 12 | 75.8 | 18 | |
2013 | 18 | 74.1 | 19 | |
2014 | 14 | 83.5 | 20 | |
2015 | 18 | 91.7 | 21 | |
2016 | 21 | 105.9 | 22 | 103 |
2017 | 7 | 91.4 | 23 | 103 |
2018 | 21 | 108.4 | 24 | 103 |
2019 | 15 | 101.2 | 25 | 103 |
2020 | 16 | 98.4 | 26 | 103 |
98-108 | 103 |
He sure has his ups and downs, although his 2020 average is only 3 lower than his 2019 average. Priced about right, maybe a little low. His miss last year was being dropped so that’s a thing. Does have an injury history even taking that into account. Not a terrible pick but probably not the best available.
Tim Taranto
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2017 | 12 | 66.5 | 19 | |
2018 | 21 | 88.7 | 20 | 90 |
2019 | 22 | 102.4 | 21 | 98 |
2020 | 11 | 84.5 | 22 | 98 |
95-105 | 98 |
He’s at the magic age of 23, although he shows zero sign of being an uber-premo, he at least Could go back up to his 2019 average, which he is priced 18 points below. Floor priced for sure. Assuming he is healthy he could be a bargain. It would help if the Giants pulled whatever is stuck somewhere from wherever it is stuck. Not euphemisms, I have no idea what where that is causing them to be so wacky and zany. If they can cut back to just wacky that would be a big help to all their Supercoach assets. Of course they could go full Wacky, Zany, and Kooky, in which case, well, would be fun to watch for all non GWS fans. It is very hard to imagine his going down and he is cheap, so way temping even with whatever is going on at his team. Another downside is that even if he goes up 20 points he is still a mid averaging 105.
Jack Steele
Year | Games | Average | Age | TLA |
2015 | 7 | 64.3 | 19 | |
2016 | 10 | 63.8 | 20 | |
2017 | 20 | 91.1 | 21 | 90 |
2018 | 21 | 94.4 | 22 | 95 |
2019 | 20 | 95 | 23 | 100 |
2020 | 17 | 122.5 | 24 | 115 |
110-120 | 115 |
After a 27 point increase in average, it is very likely he drops back down, extra so shine that average was in the Bizzaro season. He’s just a bad risk this year. Of course he could stay at the ceiling he is clinging to, but that usually just happens in cartoons. Love the player, but not in SC this year. Well, to start, you never know who will become cheap during this season.
Thanks for reading!
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Great work FD . Taranto was in my considerations but I’d be starting him to finish an M8 and just not sure he will cut it.. what are your thoughts on Andy Brayshaw? All the makings of anorher small breakout year and go 110ish?
My issue with starting a designated M8, like Taranto, is that unless you absolutely nail every other pick, it’s likely that someone you thought was a guaranteed M1-6, has an off year like Cripps, and suddenly you’ve got two mids outside the top tier.
I’ll do him in the next batch!
I love Tim’s discount but I worry I would want to replace him near the end of the season. If only he played Defense
Based on this writeup who we picking?
T/U Merrett
T/D Steele
Cheers
I currently have Neale, Clarry, Cripps and Rowell.
I’ve had Gaff in my team as a safe pick for quite a while. He’s actually one of the few I haven’t cut and uncut repeatedly. Longer quarters and those who are good runners should do OK.
Great write up FD! Anyone have any thoughts on Worpel, breakout season ahead? Or does JOM and TMitch take too many points away from him?
All opinions, even those berating me, are welcomed 🙂
T/U Get him in
T/D Chuck him out!