36 thoughts on “Progress Scores – Round 2”

    1. Same here Nato 🙁

      Had the E on Hollands and will hope Uwlands doesn’t play so I can take his 70 odd

      Bruhn has ruin me

      2

      0
  1. 535/5

    Satan, Dunks, Neale, Ashcroft & McKenna.

    4 tons tonight, wouldn’t think it would be frustrating but Neale another flat ton and Satan unfortunately improperly scored in a disjointed game shitting me a little bit.

    Paying up for Neale, Satan and Laird reaping nowhere near the dividends I’d planned. Satan was OG tonight though, just deserved more.

    Big Saturday tmmrw. Looking forward to it.

    2

    0
  2. 570 / 4 / Satan

    Solid start. I don’t have Wilmot, but his performance is making me think I’ll give Jones another run before trading him. $105k from a potential downgrade is looking sweet. Might make a trade this week though to free up a potential three next week

    0

    0
  3. Cracking start, very happy
    814/7/Clarry

    Hopefully the other rooks can match Ashcroft, Hollands and Mckenna’s scores
    Hopper I’m looking at you this week, Tiges gunna smash Croms so hopefully get gets some – Side note, feels good not having Bruhn and more

    Can anyone answer this sub question – Is the 1st EMG always the sub?
    Misses’ team is going well and she wants to take Clarry’s score but need to know if McAndrew is going to play, named 1st EMG for the Swannies

    0

    1
    1. Nah, and you’ll notice that the order can change depending on what source you check as I have A. Sheldrick listed first. Only way to know the sub is checking half an hour before the game but I’d be surprised if it was McAndrew. Wish her luck.

      2

      0
    1. There used to be a bug where if they scored exactly 0, that it was treated like they didn’t play and your emergency came in.

      This got fixed about 3 years ago, so you’ll be wearing Gawn’s zero.

      0

      1
  4. 1771/16/Dunkley

    LDU, Sheezel and Ziebell combining for 394 points. Great finish to the day!

    Some big scores looming this round.

    1

    0
  5. 1646/14/Laird
    Projected 2177. Gulden, Mackenzie, Moore, King, Constable, Green, Cogs and Ginbey to come.

    1

    0
  6. 1409/10/Laird

    Everyone firing so far.

    Gulden, Mackenzie, Witts and Constable to come.

    Then…West Coast v GWS: Green, Cogs, Cumming, Cally, McGovern, Ginbey & Cole.

    Critical!

    0

    0
  7. 1756/ 17/ C Oliver
    Tom Green on debut ,Gulden and Heeney plus rookies to come . H Clark and Young had poor scores again and JHF was terrible on debut . Very happy that I kept faith in Hopper though . English and Marshall also fired in the Ruck for me .

    1

    0
  8. 1800/17/ Bont

    One of those being Gawn hurts the score by a lot, did a good job with rookies but premiums failed to fire.

    So got 3 trades to go next week. Fix some issues, rookie correct

    0

    0
  9. 1418 /13/green

    Gawn R1 also
    Sicily
    Green
    Mackenzie
    Callaghan
    Ginbey
    King
    Flanders
    Davey
    Contstanble 2 come

    0

    0
  10. 1320/14 Green(c)
    Mackenzie,Witts,green,coniglio
    Gulden, Constable, Callaghan,Ginbey
    Need to find 90 on my opponent.
    Tu)Do I take Bonts 125 or
    Rd)roll the dice for a few more with Green or Witts( and hope Mackenzie,Witt’s, coniglio pick up the slack ?

    8

    0
  11. 1362/14/Laird VC, Touk C
    Made a crucial loophole error, but have a potential solution to maybe win my league game…

    TU: Should I trade in Yeo for Day so I can put the C on him and get Laird’s 147 (and my emergency’s 51)
    TD: Just leave it and hope Touk goes big today and keep the C on him

    1

    4
  12. 1714/16/Laird

    Much better than last round. Actually have a chance in my LoEC matchup this week. 200 points up with Blakey vs Cogs, Callaghan and Cole so by no means do I feel relaxed but hopefully can hold on. Gulden, Mackenzie, Constable, Green and Ginbey are my others to come so hoping for 2200+

    0

    0

Leave a Reply to JJBKeeper Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *