Table For Two – Round 7

Written by Gunboat Diplomacy on April 28 2022

Got a one way or the other SC dilemma? You’ve come to the right place.

Put your question to the masses and answer others using the T.U and T.D function.

0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

61 thoughts on “Table For Two – Round 7”

  1. Looking at going
    Grundy, Rachele & J. Hayes > Gawn, Clarry & S. Hayes.
    Would leave me with 24 trades, 2 boosts and $29k left.

    TU: pull the trigger
    TD: stop burning all your trades

    47

    4
  2. Doesn’t how much I try to fix up my forward situation with 3 players out and Grundy. I have to field either McCreery or Durdin. Hopefully Dixon has recovered. So worst case scenario.

    TU: McCreery
    TD: Durdin

    24

    5
  3. Grundy, Xerri and J Hayes all out
    S Hayes and Oliver definitely coming in, my booster is between:

    T/U: Gawn
    Leaves me with 45k (would have to trade Rachele to rookie to go Berry or Caldwell to Cripps next week)
    Martin as F5 (have to field one of Rosas/De Koning at F6)
    S Hayes as R3

    T/D: Parker
    Leaves me with 228k (to go Berry or Caldwell straight to Cripps next week)
    Martin as F6
    S Hayes as R2, Dixon as R3

    22

    9
  4. Who best to trade out dictates trade target.

    Rachelle is a live body but price due to drop. Hayes (STK) gone for the season but price will stay same this week.

    TU – trade Rachelle and get Sicily or Heeney
    TD – trade Hayes and get Houston or Parker

    18

    7
  5. Witts, Xerri, Hayes -> Oliver, Parker, Hayes

    Bloody tempting, would give me a team of:

    Short, Sinclair, Sicily, Hewett, Daicos, NOD (Mccartin, Dekoning)

    Steele, Oliver, Neale, Macrae, Miller, Cripps, Berry, N Martin (JHF, Rachele, Long)

    Gawn, Preuss (Hayes)

    Dunkley, Treloar, Parker, Brodie, Butters, Coniglio (Rosas, Dixon)

    Would be left with $33k, 24 trades and two boosts remaining. No interesting rookies on bubble for possibly the next two weeks and only Berry/Martin/Daicos/NOD to upgrade

    Tu: go for it

    Td: trade more conservatively, move JHF and Rachele on

    9

    7
    1. Split is concerning, I think a simple Xerri > Oliver, Rachele > Clark is probably the better/safer way to go

      3

      0
    1. big Tex Walker is pretty consistent, apart from his indiscretion late last year he was pretty solid, 3x 100’s from 3 so far this season…

      0

      2
  6. Entertaining the idea of leaving J.Hayes since his price won’t move and instead move out JHF to get the likes of Parker/De Goey.

    T/U Keep JHF (once his 39 goes out, he’ll make money and solid JS).
    T/D Out JHF (Can always downgrade Hayes at a later point/’C’ loophole option)

    I’d prefer to upgrade Rachele but the $$ just falls short. Cheers

    14

    4
  7. Which do you prioritise trading.

    TU: Rachele whose BE is 80+ projected to lose $$$ and in BAD form.

    TD: xerri whose not playing and can deal with in a week’s time as won’t lose $$ . (Martin F8 so don’t need the traded in player to be fielded)

    6

    9
  8. TU: Oliver
    TD: Witherden

    Interesting one, considering avoiding Oliver due to the Covid breakout and have realised a backman would take NOD to mid bench and loop hole with JHF.
    Thoughts on comments.

    13

    3
  9. Need to get rid of Xerri, Hayes and Grundy. Going Hayes to Hayes and Xerri to Parker but I don’t know what to do with Grundy. Also using 3 trades leaving me with 29

    T/up – Grundy to Preuss leaving me with $268k

    T/down – Grundy to Witts or O’Brien leaving me with $36k or $45k respectively

    7

    7
  10. TU: Xerri + JHF/Rachele for Oliver + Rosas
    (Go safe, save a boost)

    TD: Xerri + Chapman + Rowell for Oliver + Vlastuin + Rosas
    (Risk it for the biscuit)

    6

    1
    1. McCartin comes straight back in next week. Who knows where Hinge is at? Only had 15 touches or something in the SANFL last week.

      0

      0
    1. I’m tossing up between the two as well in addition to Brayshaw this week to bulk up my mid.

      1

      0
  11. Revisiting this with Hewett now out

    TU: Xerri + JHF/Rachele for Oliver + Rosas
    (Go safe, save a boost but cop a donut for a week)

    TD: Xerri + Chapman + Rowell for Oliver + Vlastuin + Rosas
    (Risk it for the biscuit)

    0

    3
  12. Rachelle to Rozee -100k
    Does Kenny keep giving Rozee Mid time so he can ave 100 ?
    Similar to the past 2 weeks. Great buy and great POD if he does
    Or is it same old Rozee going forward to rot in the Pocket and dream about moving into the Middle and pumping out scores in the 30’s ?

    T/U Go for it you visionary
    T/D You been eating the those Crazy Cookies again and will pay the Price !

    1

    3
  13. Rachele’s scores have gone big, small, small, big, small, small.

    Do we expect him to go large against an underwhelming GWS?

    TU: Keep him for the cash gen boost, sell Hayes now.
    TD: Sell him now, ditch Hayes next week.

    Either way, I plan on bringing in Oliver, Hayes (Port) and Rosas (with around 200k ITB for next week – unfortunately not enough to stretch to a Parker etc this round)

    3

    2
  14. TU:
    Sell Grundy, Xerri and Rachele
    Buy Hayes, Petracca and Parker (only 29k ITB)

    TD:
    Sell Grundy, Xerri and Hayes
    Buy: Oliver, Hayes and Rosas (279 ITB for another upgrade next week)

    4

    1
    1. Forgot to add, Option 1 leaves me with no bench cover FWD, whereas Option 2 leaves me Rachele as an emergency forward on the bench.

      0

      0
  15. Ok, where is the team delete button?

    Trade – Xerri/Hayes > Hayes/Lloyd or Xerri/Hayes > Hayes/Houston

    TU: Hayes/Lloyd (Hopefully starts sea-gulling again)

    TD: Hayes/Houston (Hopefully this is his year!)

    Comment: Bailey Dale for a POD.

    0

    0
  16. With all this catastrophe I’m going to boost my way into a DEF upgrade.

    Who to get?

    TU Stewart
    TD Defendlebury

    Comment for any other under $575K – Witherden as a POD? May? Rich? Ryan? Dale? Dawson?

    5

    2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *