I’m not going to even bother with the underperformers this week because its just the same old names: Tippett, Simmonds, and White. None of them average over 50 points a game and none of them scored over 70 last week. Move on, people, there’s nothing to see here…..
But there is something to look at here!!
A Sandilands ($560,500 $+17,000 ($+21,900), 120.00) – Didn’t just score 100. He scored 145! Has become THE must-have ruckman in the comp.
D Cox ($474,900 $-3,400 ($-115,100), 75.20) – Backed up last week’s 119 with a very creditable 87. Over the last 3 games has averaged 95. All aboard the Coxy train!! Chooo choooo!!!!
Got to mention the performance of a guy who scored 96 on the weekend that’s only valued at $402,900. Maybe Mitch Clark has finally worked out his role…
Related Posts:
, later Smurfs.
{ 30 comments… read them below or add one }
All over Coxy next week – Dropped in price again even though he scored 87 and comes up against Big Sandi this week. Looking for another price drop, which should be his last, this week.
Only problem then will be deciding whether to put all my eggs in one basket and have Cox and Nic Nat in the same side, or trade Nic Nat which would leave me with Cox and Hille.
Decisions, decisions.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I reckon Hille is looking shaky (Ryder aint much better) and Nicnat is starting to shape up into a very strong second ruck.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Motts, put yourself in the shoes of a trade addict with only 15 trades left.
<..>
Who me??
Now. Would you go Hunt–>Davis and Seaby–>Sandi this week? Is it too good to refuse? (I’d still have a strong back line with Davis and Nason on the pine). Or do I back Seaby to come good??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That’s a good trade, Spoon. I’d do it.
But then I wouldn’t trade for another 6 weeks. Can you trust yourself?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You godda deal Mottsy.
Best thing is Seaby is unlikely to fire this week against Lewy and Clarke and faces the Cats at home the following week.
Seeing his mid-40s after I trade him out will make me feel all gooey in menswear department.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
HEY SPOONS discovered a way of feeding my trade addition . Created another sc team using the cooks e mail adress.I trade on this one every week ,& keep my original side in check.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think I’m gonna use my dreamteam in that way Scratchy. Believe it or not….that team OUTSCORED my SC team this week. Argh. The pain!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Looking for some advise on long term and short term gain on upgrading Seaby to Sandilands or Cox..
Is the extra $90K worth it? or should I use that to upgrade Martin when he peaks in value.. I also have Ball, Mitchell and Selwood that will need to upgrade if they don’t pick up thier game…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Cox has proved he can be just as good as Sandilands in the past, if not better… it’s just a matter of if he’s over his prior injury and form worries, but that 119 is promising… My preferred option is to take Cox and pocket the $90K for a midfield trade. Might be a little of a differential too. Sandi’s two best scores have been against Adelaide (124) and Richmond (145), the cellar dwellers of the competition.
I’d love to know what Cox averages against Freo though, anyone know where to get this data??… Does Sandi limit his scoring capability in the big Derbys??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Thanks MJ.. Good point, Everyone has Sandi and lots would have dropped Cox.. If he can get back to his last year form he’ll be an awesome buy.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Cox scored 72 last year against Freo, and 86 and 81 the year before that . . . all low scores for him. I’m waiting till after this round to see where he and Sandi sit.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
And big Sandi scored similar points in each of those 3 games, so they seem to share the points.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m in tha same boat and going Sandi – he looks like a sure thing. Cox is *almost* a sure thing, but there is still doubt. People have been destined for greatness before and failed to live up to it all season.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hope your not talking about Mottsey.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hey hey hey. Mottsy FULFILS his destiny of greatness..
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yeah, in he’s dreams.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Fulfilled it last week against your boys, PA.
Nuff said!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
We’ll see Mottsy, when finals come around ( if I make it, Haha )
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
NUFF SAID
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Damn. Gram’s still out
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Rocky got dropped.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
And Peterson
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
And Warnock
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Martin out injured
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
And no Boyd or Mitchell
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m swinging the axe but can’t decide which of the three duds in my backline to give the boot – Waite, Hunt or Ladson. Wish I could dump all three but can only afford one trade thanks to another kamikaze stunt by dangerman!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’d go Ladson. Waite’s been named on an extended bench and Hunt’s price increase should have a little more to go . . . though he probably won’t see much of the ball this week playing in the Cats’ backline.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Two in two days, Mikey nice.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Go Tiges!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yep Ladson is gone – 5 tackles in 5 matches is pretty poor for a backman! Hopefull Hunt wanders up the ground a bit on Sunday.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0