R14 Progress Scores

Written by MJ on June 22 2017

Firstly, how nice is it to see nine games on the fixture this week?!

As always, we love hearing how you are going throughout the round.

Score / No of Players / Captain

1
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

27 thoughts on “R14 Progress Scores”

  1. I have a few trade options to ponder tomorrow.

    T/U Downgrade J. Berry/T. Stewart – L. Ryan. Upgrade S. Selwood – D. Martin/Z. Merrett.

    T/D Downgrade J. Berry/T. Stewart – L. Ryan. Upgrade J. Parsons – I. Heeney/J. Macrae/T. Greene.

    Let me know in the comments which people you would select 🙂

    0

    5
    1. Heeney. I’m VC’ing him tomorrow night and Parsons can’t crack 50. You’ll be relieved when he’s gone, painful to watch.
      Selwood will hopefully only miss 2 games and be M9.

      2

      0
  2. 173 after titch and laird. Want to get Greenwood score. Who to loophole off

    T/u steele
    T/d lynch

    Question becomes moot if steele doesnt make the final cut

    10

    2
  3. Thank you Mr Greenwood for tonning up (and turning up for that matter) to cover for the unexplained absence of Mr Sandilands.
    However, it would seem as though you announced it to the world in advance as everybody I am playing against either has you on the field or has loopholed you so no advantage gained!!!

    10

    0
  4. I have the E on Greenwood on the FWD bench with Parsons. Currently have a FWD of Dahl, Yeo, Buddy, Higgins, Steele & Heeney.
    Taranto is in the MID but looking to trade to Lloyd. Moved Nank to RUC last week in Sandi trade so Strnadica is RUC bench.

    If Steele doesn’t get a gig (to provide a loophole option), any thoughts on best way to benefit from Greenwood’s score last night?

    0

    0
    1. If Steele doesn’t play (and I don’t think he will), then you don’t have to do anything to get Greenwood’s score.
      If Steele does play, there isn’t much you can do unless you have a non-playing M/F in the mids you can swap him with. I wouldn’t recommend trading in a donut just to get Greenwood’s score.

      3

      0
  5. 702/7 (Including Greenwood’s loopholed 127)

    Only Laird and Buddy failing to go 90+ so far and Buddy managed to pull out an 83 despite failing to kick a goal. Have avoided the carnage so far, but we all know the Supercoach gods play no favourites.

    0

    0
    1. 15/1530

      Danger (C), J.Selwood, D.Martin, Docherty, Nankervis, Lynch and Witts to come.

      Projected 2,470 but realistically, will settle for 2,400

      0

      0
  6. 1710/17/danger

    Shaw, laird, Buddy, Daniher, Sloane and rocky all let downs.

    Hopefully can crack 2400 with danger nank Selwood doc and the amazing parsons to come

    1

    0
  7. Hey guys, what would you do in this situation? I have nank in the ruck with no cover if he is a late out. And I also have fyfe in the mids with only picket left as cover cause Barrett was no good.
    Thumbs up trade fyfe to sellwood and hope nank plays
    Or
    Thumbs down if I need wait till the 3.20 game and trade nank to Kruzer if nank is a late out

    Really stuck on this
    Cheers

    1

    5
  8. 14/1319/Danger probably
    Beams has killed me this week. Sloane continues to disappoint since bringing in. A few will be catching me in the cup.

    2

    0
  9. 1,484/16 danger to come, hopefully

    Priddis and Barrett (in for Fyfe) probably cost me 60/70 points between them so not happy. Rage trading Priddis at the minute.

    0

    0
  10. 1490/15

    Considering ive had Beams 12 i can’t really complain too much. Was projected for 2400 but ill take 2300 hopefully considering Beams.

    Danger (C), Jelwood, Dusty, Rance, Nank, Docherty, Lynch to go.

    0

    0
  11. 1631/14/Bont VC activated

    2400 would be very nice, but anything above would probably need a good performance from the Suns today.

    Danger, Jelwood, Murphy, Doch, Nank (biggest worry – have no replacement unless I trade), Harbrow, Witts, Lynch to play…
    Any idea if Nank is out yet, anyone?
    Whats the best source for updates on Nank’s situation? Apart from SCT, of course.

    0

    0
  12. ok decision time- i asked earlier in the weekend about taking JPK’s VC score of 127 over danger, and got a majority thumbs up for JPK. looking at dangers last four games though i can’t see him going to much smaller than 120 and potentially can see him smashing a big score out against freo, so i think i’ll stick with danger as C.
    T/U stick to your guns Con Danger
    T/D why ask if you’re not going to listen, take JKP’s VC score
    thanks !

    1

    7
  13. 1582/15, Danger C after Sloane’s VC failed.

    I’ve loopholed Hannan and Parsons for F6, who’s score do I take?

    TU: Bank Hannan’s 56
    TD: Roll the dice with Parsons

    3

    2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *