A little late I know, but who did you give the captaincy to this week?
Loading ...Related Posts:
Tie a Yellow Ribbon
Loading ...Previous post: Progress Scores R15
Next post: My Day In The Box
- Home
- Forum
- SC Stats
- About Us
- Advertising
- Injury Update
- Motts' Movers
- Polls
- Rookie Review
- Weekly Teams
- Our Feed
|
|
|
Loading ...Connect with Us!
Supercoach Stats
2012 Bye Rounds
Official Sites
-
-
The Coaches Box - Live Chat
Latest on Tue, 11:47 pm: Looking forward to it Mottsy!
: Mottsy has gone to some effort with the Ruck Movers this week. Up on the site first thing tomorrow morning.
: WTF Motts? Why is he having a dump in the tree?
: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I0t1Ys3DfBE
: Murphy is going to be out for 8-10 weeks
, later Smurfs.: Im goin Dal'santo his cheap cheap cheap and he fits into my bye strategy.I wish i could go Stants but that would give me 3 premos with the rd 12 bye.
Supercoach & AFL On Twitter
{ 23 comments… read them below or add one }
yay 2nd vote
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
what should i do with ziebell? i have $463,200
1. Trade him for dale thomas this week
or
2. Put him on the bench for this week, jaensch will cover for him. Then next week pick up didak for him, in the hope that didaks price drops to 463,200 or lower.
Didaks breakeven is 118 do you think his price will drop enough for me to pick him up next week or should i just go for daisy whos consistently scoring 80-99 with the odd ton every now and again
Which option would you go for 1 or 2?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I woulda gone 2 – what’d you end up doing?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Agree with the Caaarlton bloke, although Daisy may become a nice unique for you come finals time.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Goddard not an viable Captain option, Motts?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Point. I always miss someone. Don’t think he plays too well up there, does he?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Doesn’t really matter with his form this year I would have thought.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Did you captain him?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Nope. GAJ every week for me
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I know Hawthorn never tag GAJ but I went with Sandilands this week. Scored 145 the last time he played Richmond.
Oh, and for those that are interested I brought in Montagna for Barlow this week.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Pendles for me – and gee was he good.
Swannie into my DT – and gee was he good.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
umm hes currently on the bench, havent decided yet lol 9 mins til lockout
do u reckon didak will reach his breakeven or not?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Even if he goes over it, he’s not going to go WELL over it. So for the extra dollars you may spend, you get an extra week to think about it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
i ended up going with daisy, as a unique pick, only because no other people in my league have him. Couldn’t really chose between them.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
did you try taking off the black and white glasses?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
your right, my cats glasses should be on, GO GEELONG!!!
thank god i went for daisy 20 opening quarter compared to didaks 6
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
i’m thinking of just picking up daisy, only becasue i reckon didaks price won’t drop low enough
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Surely you have to have GAJ in your team – anyone who hasn’t got him must be a dil and if he’s not your Captain….. jeez – surely its a no-brainer.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I gave the job to the big Sandi this week and think he can get the job done.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Me too. The only thing that counted against him was the loss of Barlow and the effect it may have on his “hitouts to advantage”.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That might become an issue going forward, but I’m not sure that Richmond has the midfield class to effectively feed on Sandi’s taps.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Don’t know about that. Mike will tell you that Cotchin, Martin, Tuck, Jackson, Deledio and even Nason are all more than capable at ground level.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
We’ll see. Richmond have their attributes and are improving. Whilst I stand by my original diagnosis, I accept that they need to be respected and I’m sure that Freo will do that.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0