BRAYSHAW v Tigers
- L3 v Tigers: 190, 63, 36 (96 av.)
- L3 @ MRVL: 132, 87, 132 (117 av.)
It was an uphill battle for Brayshaw to scrape a respectable score last week after no touches until 2 minutes to go in the 1st and persistent looks from Mills at stoppage. Should have a much easier go at it against one of the comp’s leakiest midfields. 120 at a minimum and large if it all falls his way with good efficiency early.
LAIRD v Swans
- L3 v Swans: 121, 88, 89 (99 av.)
- L3 @ SCG: 121, 89, 110 (107 av.)
Being a highly restrictive side with multiple midfield gears sees very few captaincy candidates drawn from match ups against the Swans – Laird however is just simply on another level. 126.5 average, M2, jostling with Satan and Neale and a triple digit floor. Oh, and he laid 20 tackles last week! Hits that consistency again this week for 125.
MILLS v Crows
- L3 v Crows: 93, 85, 49 (76 av.)
- L3 @ SCG: 138, 86, 117 (114 av.)
Enter the man I opted for instead of Laird all those weeks ago. Mills has the highest midfield ceiling of any player but only hits that in certain conditions: soft match up, Swans dominance and the entirety of the game OB. The OB limb has been confounded by the Swans midfield depth and development and Mills utility being shifted onto a wing or as a spare, however the Swans shouldn’t need to move too many magnets against a firmly bottom four Crows side. Looks like a solid match up for 130.
NEALE v Suns
- L3 v Suns: 108, 64, 151 (108 av.)
- L3 @ G: 89, 135, 123 (116 av.)
Mild attention from Ash last week and still went 120. Doubt the Suns unsettle their midfield to put time into him and should play it straight up. Neale a lock for 130 in what should be a red hot Q Clash.
MILLER v Lions
- L3 v Lions: 99, 115, 80 (98 av.)
- L3 @ G: 115, 122, 80 (106 av.)
Similar to Neale, Miller got ridden by Caldwell last week by still tonned and, impressively, still had 15 CP, 7 tackles and 600 MG – that’s insane for someone tagged in a drubbing. Will be battling it out against Neale to topscore, a 130 for him as well.
SATAN v Dogs
- L3 v Dogs: 112, 144, 139 (132 av.)
- L3 @ MRVL: 178, 166, 139 (161 av.)
If it were a structural injury we’d be easing off Satan for the next few weeks but that thumb is reportedly fine and Satan was given an emphatic green light yesterday. Rarely gets to run out at Marvel but has gone at 160+ in recent outings there and, of course, will fire on all cylinders against a Dogs side just getting rolling. A lock for 125+.
DAICOS v Dons
- L3 v Dons: 71 (71 av.)
- L3 @ MCG: 99, 93, 112 (101 av.)
For those lucky or prudent enough to have held onto Daicos you’ll be contemplating some cheeky VCs on the run home, however hold fire for this round. He was always set to get attention no matter who he had this week after his performance against the Crows and the Dons have embraced tagging with real success over the last fortnight. Either Caldwell or Guelfi go to him and will seek to curb his influence, likely a 90.
Named both of these gentlemen in last week’s article and they vindicated myself and owners nicely. Bont just had a classic Atlas game and the concomitance of Parish’s injury and the Dons late switch to a liberated play style again helped Zerrett. Great match ups and scoring histories for both this weekend, 130s all round.
BONTEMPELLI v Dees
- L3 v Dees: 105, 136, 125 (122 av.)
- L3 @ MRVL: 181, 136, 109 (142 av.)
ZERRETT v Pies
- L3 v Pies: 123, 120, 116 (120 av.)
- L3 @ MCG: 140, 90, 102 (111 av.)
We’ve then got the Saints only constants, Sinclair and Steele, as our final two smoky picks simply by virtue of their quality as players and the fact they’re playing West Coast. We leak galling disposal differentials and get shredded on contested possession, so both should sail to 140s.
SINCLAIR v Eagles
- L3 v Eagles: 96, 66, 86 (83 av.)
- L3 @ OS: 114, 96, 51 (87 av.)
STEELE v Eagles
- L3 v Eagles: 109, 150, 122 (127 av.)
- L3 @ OS: 111, 109, 85 (102 av.)
This has been the most confounding write up I’ve done all year. We’re not at all bereft of options but it’s hard to pin down a combination of two given so many players, and popular ones at that, can go large this week. On my end, giving heavy consideration to Brayshaw and Mills as early VCs but currently thinking Satan into Sinclair. Neale and Miller not making the decision any easier either.
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
26 thoughts on “Captaincy Candidates – Round 19”
thanks GD, my gut feel says Rowell will go to Neale… Laird into Satan for mine.
Brayshaw into Neale for me
GreAt write up GD, tough decision this week!
Out of curiosity, is a SCT league ranking thread being done this week?
Aha. Don’t worry, Catta. Going to get to that. It’ll go up tonight or tomorrow morning, just had a busier than usual early week.
Great write up GD. Honestly very unsure where to go now that I own all of the options except for Steele. Might just do Laird into Oliver and not overthink it but you make a great case for Mills and Brayshaw as VC options
for those non owners of brayshaw like me,
is Brodie worth a look ?
new buy mills into neale otherwise for me
Yeah, considered discussing Brodie but TOG always going to cap his ceiling. Watch him open with a 50 point first though.
Precision prediction haha, 47 pt first qtr
So many option to pick from but im going Laird > Steele
Laird into Oliver 120 Passmark
Amazing work on this one GD.
Keeping it simple. Brayshaw -> Neale.
Don’t mind Bont as well, just too many players that can go large in that game for my liking.
The Sat night match ups make this week a mare !! So the v on Brayshaw…..then goodness knows !!!
It’s so much fun when my VC fails, so I’ll pick Mills just to be let down again…
Neale – Walsh
Any stats on Macrae, GD?
MACRAE v Dees
L3 v Dees: 133, 146, 145
L3 @ MRVL: 128, 123, 107
Macrae into Merrett
Thanks as always GD.
Mills into Sinclair for me.
Reckon my Swans put some work into Laird with Ryan Clarke already successful in the shut down role a couple of times post bye. That and Mills at SCG is irresistible.
Copping a donut this week in defence so really need PODs Jed Anderson and Keays to run a muck out there.
This round has been really doing my head in, but I think I may have found a solution.
VC is Laird.
I could go Darcy VC and Laird C but Rory doesn’t have a great record against Sydney so I would rather have him as VC just in case.
The C so hard this week .
I think I may take a punt on Walsh.
With Hewett out surely he’s the one that gets more midfield time. He also plays a similar role to McCluggage that went 150 last week on GWS. The Giants gave up huge midfield points last week as well .
Tell me I’m crazy !
Neale into Walsh for me I think
Neale easing gently into Zerrett
After much consideration Goldstein into Daicos
Anyone else thinking about chucking the VC on Darcy tonight? Solo rucking against a team that gives away a lot of points in the middle. Could also pose a threat to the Tigers defence. He’s also gone 110+ in all 3 games at Marvel this year and can really go big on his day. Thoughts?
TU: Go for it!
TD: Better options out there
T/U – Walsh
T/D – Steele