Malceski or McKenzie

Written by Duck on July 2 2013

You’ve got some issues in your backline, you’ve got just under $500k to play with, with only these 2 blokes to choose from;

Nick Malceski, (SYD) $477,200,  averaging 92.92

Or

Trent McKenzie, (GCS) $477,500, averaging 96.78

Who’s your pick?

Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.

 

0
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

19 thoughts on “Malceski or McKenzie”

  1. Just looking at the finals run for both teams makes the decision a bit easier;

    Malceski vs Collingwood, St Kilda, Geelong and Hawthorn

    McKenzie vs Melbourne, Port Adelaide, St Kilda and the Giants

    Eski has struggled with forward tags too, and the good teams won’t let him fun free.

    0

    0
  2. A few questions:

    1/. Is getting rid of Zorko a good idea? I have persistently held on to him and he just keeps under performing.
    My thoughts would be Staker to forward line: Zorko—> Clisby

    2/. Is it worth keeping Terlich all year? Even though he plays for Melbourne and most weeks they are soundly beaten, he still manages to score well, especially in the win. If yes, could I keep him on the field?

    3/. Is Hanley worth it? I’m thinking yes but would just like to clarify.

    4/. Should I consider holding Nicholls or upgrading to premium ruckman? I already have Jacobs and Roughead

    0

    0
  3. Thought Harry Taylor might be a good option too or even Robert Murphy?? Thoughts ?
    Mckenzie TU
    Taylor TD

    0

    0
  4. Backline currently is; Goddard, Gibbs, Hanley, Shaw, Vlastuin and Goodes (Clisby & Thurlow).

    Only have 5 trades left but want to bring Mckenzie in. Should I…
    T/U – Upgrade Vlas/Goodes
    T/D – Downgrade another rookie and upgrade Thurlow
    Comment – Only 5 trades left, HOLD.

    0

    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *