Value Picks – FWDs

Written by on March 18 2020

Hey all

Here’s a comprehensive list of the FWD eligible players ranked by their Marsh Series’ performances (based on $/PPM)

Now here’s a list of the 15 most popular mid-priced FWDs, in terms of SC ownership (as of 5.30am, 18/03/2019).  The screen grab from the SuperCoach website shows player, price and % ownership.  PTA stands for ‘Priced to Average’. NTA stands for ‘Needs to Average’.  This is what they will need to average to make $150k, or if that req’d average works out to be greater than 95 to make $150k, I have simply reduced their req’d average to 95, since this will necessarily put them in ‘Keeper’ territory.  The final column % Req’d indicates the % differential between what is required for them to be valuable vs what they are priced to average.

There are quite a few players that people are interested in, so let’s have a closer look at the top 10 first up.

1. Devon SMITH ave’d over 95 just two years ago and performed well in the MS (Marsh Series).  I am confident that he can average 95 or close to it, at least until Heppell returns to full fitness and playing at full capacity.  VERDICT: safe to start him, but if the season is delayed and Heppell is back, I won’t be.  Will personally take a more expensive risk and will make a corrective trade to him if he looks the goods.

2. Jack STEVEN is only going to get better with matches.  If he can stay mentally strong, then I envisage him only increasing his MID minutes as the only Cat anywhere near capable of filling the huge Tim Kelly hole.  VERDICT: if he’s mentally OK, he is one of the better FWD picks.

3. Aiden BONAR doesn’t look good enough to me when the Roos reach full strength and has already sent us a soft-tissue warning.  VERDICT: There are better picks out there.

4. Andrew BRAYSHAW is bigger, fitter and guaranteed more MID time in 2020.  He hasn’t missed a game apart from when he had his teeth knocked out so is also incredibly durable.  A gun who will be given the opportunity to grow in a rebuilding FRE side.  Needs a considerable rise in output, but increased TOG and more consistent MID time suggest he is more than capable.  If game time is reduced, I’m even more convinced.  Verdict: a Yes from me.

5. Christian PETRACCA.  All the signs are there and big Max has stated that he WILL be starting in the midfield.  That should be enough for everyone to start him given his his key indicators, full pre-season and the ceiling he showed in MS1.  VERDICT:  should be a lock, but not for me.

6. Darcy MACPHERSON showed signs last year when given the opportunity both inside and outside.  Stand-in skipper Swallow identified Darcy as THE breakout contender in 2020 at the Suns.  VERDICT:  not for the faint-hearted, but was almost top 6 last year and can only improve.  Yes from me.

7. Hugh GREENWOOD seems to be getting a lot less love than earlier in the pre-season, but is likely still a good pick.  Can’t see him going backwards, but think there may be others who will either do better, or make more money.  VERDICT: safe to start with very little to lose.

8. Tom J LYNCH.  Well, I’ve banged on about him for months.  Is severely underpriced and showed in the back half of last year and Finals that he is more than capable of a 90+ average.  He’s been in and out of my side, but is currently IN, with a shorter season now planned and RIC likely to go hard from the start.  VERDICT: a gamble that could be the biggest return of the lot.  Or the worst!

9. Jack LUKOSIUS is likely another safe pick, but am not sure he can average what we need him to (nearly 85).  VERDICT: Does look great, but just think there are better options.  Will likely leave owners in no-mans-land.

10. Jonathan PATTON has injury history like no other.  Shorter season may help, but I think CEGLAR from the Hawks is a safer and stronger pick. VERDICT: not for me, due to injury history and better options at the same club.

____________________________________

Now let’s have a look at some others who either SCTers have specifically asked for, or who I reckon are decent sleepers.

Jacob TOWNSEND came with Carracella from the Tigers and is key to ESS’s new FWD structure.  Will likely play every game and will score as he has in the past. VERDICT: I have him locked in at F6.

Lachlan SCHULTZ needs a mention after a decent MS and having been in the system a year longer than the rookies priced around him.  FRE’s new game style is conducive to decent SC-scoring and he could be a key benefactor.  VERDICT: Fantasy Freako likes him, but I prefer Townsend.

Jonathan CEGLAR was mentioned above, but has surprisingly low ownership.  The risk is that he doesn’t get 75%+ RUC time, but if he does, could be the Rowan Marshall (not to that extent) of 2020.  VERDICT:  classic risk/reward pick.  If you’re going Naismith or another risky R2, then he is a MUST as potential cover with a RUC/FWD dpp loophole at R3.

Darcy TUCKER is one of those who has been taken under Nat FYFE’s wing.  With ACRES out for a while, he could have been an excellent pick, but with an extended delay almost certain very soon, then it is ACRES himself who will come back into calculations!  VERDICT: One Docker is enough!

Zac LANGDON from GWS is another who looks to have improved massively during the MS and is keen as mustard to make one of the sml FWD spots his at the Giants.  On current form you’d think it is his to lose, and he is massively underpriced after an injury-effected 2019 (incl. an injury-effected score in his discounted price). VERDICT:  could possibly be THE best cheap FWD pick.  May still take him in place of Townsend

Have I missed anyone?!  I can always add them if I have.  Apologies for the format, but at least you have the numbers above and now it is open for discussion.

Let’s just wait and see what happens!  Here is my current FWD line, should the season kick-off tomorrow! 😉

Madness, but 2020 feels like that sort of year! 😉

Good luck to all in 2020!

 

11
1


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

19 thoughts on “Value Picks – FWDs”

  1. Ill probably start a few of these guys, but surely Whitfield at F1 and maybe Dusty at F2 would take precedence?

    6

    0
    1. I’m with MJ. Lachie and Dusty are the lockiest of all locks. Smith has to be in the mix but i like the idea of some of the others. I’ve currently got Long at 280K in my team so i’m going even more oddball than you are allsaints.

      0

      1
  2. Hey AS, hear your concern about dev smith and impact heppell might have but don’t you think the inclusions of selwood duncan cam guthrie and maybe even menagola will have a bigger impact on Steven’s mid minutes?

    3

    0
    1. I hear ya, but not really, no. They were all there last year with TKelly so the hole still exists. Admittedly Menegola didn’t play that much, but he’ll be on a wing if selected.
      However, I am now NOT picking him as I can’t trust Chris Scott and I also think GEE are in for a mighty fall in 2020. See Natopotato’s comment below for reasons re Chris Scott. We’ll see 😉

      1

      0
    1. Doubt I can trust Steven in my team under Chris Scott (FUCS). Just best to leave him aside even if he does play as it won’t be a nice smooth season in my eyes

      2

      0
      1. Yep. And if they’re playing back2back2back, he’s no chance of playing every game! Maybe just one!!

        1

        0
  3. Jack Steven unlikely for R1 v GWS according to Chris Scott!
    (via Mitch Cleary twitter published just now on AFL app)

    5

    0
    1. Inconsistent? Yes. 95? Personally … no. Go for it, but I think he’s POD-like for a reason and with no crowd?!?

      1

      0
  4. I have Whitfield at M6. Don’t want Martin early, especially in front of no crowd. Have now dumped STEVEN for LONG and MACPHERSON for PETRACCA. It’ll likely change 15 more times before first bounce 😉

    4

    0
    1. I’m similar, I can take Whitfield at M5 or take Bont M5 (Oliver M6) . Thoughts Allsaints? (Other Mids are: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Dunkley)

      Whitfield TU
      Bont TD

      1

      7
      1. Bont. Plays 22 games. I’d dump Oliver with price changes now starting in Rd2, he will likely drop early and perhaps significantly given his match-ups. It’s the first time in three years I won’t have started him!
        If Whitfield goes down, he will now become Oliver (+ cash hopefully).
        Hmmm, now you’ve got me thinking

        1

        0
  5. If Darcy Fort gets the 1st ruck at Geelong, at $265k is he worth a forward spot (not DPP into ruck unfortunately)?

    2

    1
    1. If he played for ANYONE but FUCS or HULC, I’d say yes. Sadly, his coach can’t be trusted. A shame as he could be the best pick of all.

      Having said that, if you have decent bench cover and with the increasing likelihood of back2back2back games, it could work. You need a decent scorer at F7 tho! No risk, no reward. Good luck 😉

      2

      0
  6. What about shorter game time. Does that make Lynch less attractive as a key forward. Less goals and less points or will goals be scaled up more ?

    2

    0
    1. It will be scaled up, but I still think the 16min quarters won’t suit key forwards
      They are already playing 100% game time so can’t go up anymore. I do think midfielders (if anyone) will benefit as it could see they tog go from 85% to 90% but i don’t think it will make an huge difference

      1

      0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *