Small or Far Away, Father Dougal on Cows
Hi Everybody!
So, byes almost here. They can make a big difference in a season, either pulling ahead or dropping behind. Many of us have been through them before, but not everyone, so I’m gonna talk some about how to get though them.
Er, aren’t you, in fact, not very good at getting thought them?
Oh oh! I know the answer to that one!
Which is?
No!
I have gotten better…I hope….
There was that one time where he did so badly that he had to let me write Cow Talk the next week while he tried to recover.
And the week after that was so bad that you couldn’t handle it and I had to take over! That was fun.
For you….
And I stayed on after!
A clear sign that he escaped with no long term damage to his mental health from those three rounds….
Yes, I am completely fine and everything is under control.
So everyone should give, um, appropriate weight to your thoughts.
Right!
Right. Sigh.
Anyways, this year things are easier because we have two bye rounds with few than six teams out. Round 12 with four and Round 3 with two. But scoring for all the bye rounds is best 18 on field, so getting 18 on field is a lot easier for those rounds.
Best 18 but they have to be on field?
After emergencies, yes. If, for example, you have 7 defenders who play then only six of them get scored, like any other week.
So try not to get anyone stuck on the bench!
Right!
How do we plan for the byes?
A few weeks ago…
Well, yeah, but, you still can. The big thing it so figure out who many players will be playing each week. If 18 or more, good, if 17 or less good. But we have time to fix that.
Assuming you should
Yeah, sometime it will not be worth a trade to get another player in. But, lets talk about how to try and fix things.
First check out round 15. If you are short of 18, you can plan to trade out Cow with a R15 bye for someone who will play. Oscar Baker, for example, will play in the other byes, and can then go out before R15. If that still does get you to 18, then make a note of how many you are short.
Then check Round 14. If you are short of 18, you can plan to trade out Cow with a R15 bye for someone who will play. Mitchell, for example. You can trade him to anyone who does not have a round 14 or round 15 bye.
For Round 13, if you can’t field 18, well, um, I’m not gonna think about that, but I will pray for you. You can have lots of R13 players, and should have as many as are worth having. Which will still let you field 18.
Found Round 12, if you are short of 18, you can plan to trade out Cows for players with the round 13 bye if you can. If you have enough for R14 or R15, you can bring someone if from them, but I would be careful about bringing in someone who does not play in a round you are already having a problem with.
Once a player’s bye has passed you can bring them in for sure knowing they will play the rest of the byes. In practice you get an extra week out of them.
So, well, the idea is to know who not to bring in, and to bring in players once they are past their bye. The tricky part is what to do with players who have a later bye but you can use to upgrade before then. No one answer to that, you have to figure out what gets more points total. If you use Baker to upgrade and get 150 points from that, and you don’t use him to get in a R15 player and score 0 for that 18th spot, well, that 150 might be more that whoever would have come in for him to make 18.
To help, here are the updated charts I talked about last week.
Weeks left | Cash | Points | Make up 100 |
13 | $100,000 | 107.7 | 7.7 |
12 | $108,333 | 116.7 | 8.3 |
11 | $118,182 | 127.3 | 9.1 |
10 | $130,000 | 140.0 | 10.0 |
9 | $144,444 | 155.6 | 11.1 |
8 | $162,500 | 175.0 | 12.5 |
7 | $185,714 | 200.0 | 14.3 |
6 | $216,667 | 233.3 | 16.7 |
5 | $260,000 | 280.0 | 20.0 |
4 | $325,000 | 350.0 | 25.0 |
3 | $433,333 | 466.7 | 33.3 |
2 | $650,000 | 700.0 | 50.0 |
1 | $1,300,000 | 1400.0 | 100.0 |
Weeks left | Cash | Points |
13 | $100,000 | 100.0 |
12 | $92,308 | 92.3 |
11 | $84,615 | 84.6 |
10 | $76,923 | 76.9 |
9 | $69,231 | 69.2 |
8 | $61,538 | 61.5 |
7 | $53,846 | 53.8 |
6 | $46,154 | 46.2 |
5 | $38,462 | 38.5 |
4 | $30,769 | 30.8 |
3 | $23,077 | 23.1 |
2 | $15,385 | 15.4 |
1 | $7,692 | 7.7 |
Defenders
Sheezel: Still looking like a keeper. At the very worst keep to R15.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 198,300 | |||
1 | 114 | 198,300 | ||
2 | 114 | 198,300 | ||
3 | 120 | 198,300 | ||
4 | 111 | 304,500 | ||
5 | 100 | 381,800 | ||
6 | 53 | 431,600 | ||
7 | 107 | 438,800 | ||
8 | 110 | 443,200 | ||
9 | 68 | 452,000 | ||
10 | 112 | 464,600 | ||
11 | 100.9 | 475,400 | ||
12 | 100.9 | 479,765 | 4,365 | 4,365 |
13 | 100.9 | 497,920 | 18,154 | 22,520 |
14 | 100.9 | 506,343 | 8,424 | 30,943 |
15 | ||||
16 | 100.9 | 512,587 | 6,244 | 37,187 |
17 | 100.9 | 517,216 | 4,628 | 41,816 |
Ginbey: That 35 will slow his cash, but not stop it because of the 108 in his three round average. The problem is his bye is a round after his probable top price. On the other hand, odds are he won’t be needed to avoid a donut in the happy R13 bye.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 171,300 | |||
1 | 85 | 171,300 | ||
2 | 76 | 171,300 | ||
3 | 104 | 171,300 | ||
4 | 40 | 246,900 | ||
5 | 51 | 282,500 | ||
6 | 62 | 296,800 | ||
7 | 39 | 288,900 | ||
8 | 61 | 283,100 | ||
9 | 108 | 284,000 | ||
10 | 35 | 305,000 | ||
11 | 66.1 | 318,200 | ||
12 | 66.1 | 330,683 | 12,483 | 12,483 |
13 | 66.1 | 320,936 | -9,747 | 2,736 |
14 | ||||
15 | 66.1 | 327,814 | 6,878 | 9,614 |
16 | 66.1 | 332,912 | 5,098 | 14,712 |
17 | 66.1 | 336,690 | 3,779 | 18,490 |
McKenna: Since he covers Rounds 13-15 it might be wroth holding and hoping his price goes back up.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 167,500 | |||
1 | 93 | 167,500 | ||
2 | 78 | 167,500 | ||
3 | 57 | 167,500 | ||
4 | 86 | 227,300 | ||
5 | 55 | 268,500 | ||
6 | 57 | 287,800 | ||
7 | 70 | 302,600 | ||
8 | 46 | 306,900 | ||
9 | 35 | 306,700 | ||
10 | 53 | 296,000 | ||
11 | 63.0 | 279,900 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 63.0 | 275,947 | -3,953 | -3,953 |
14 | 63.0 | 285,714 | 9,767 | 5,814 |
15 | 63.0 | 297,488 | 11,774 | 17,588 |
16 | 63.0 | 306,216 | 8,728 | 26,316 |
17 | 63.0 | 312,685 | 6,469 | 32,785 |
Wilmot: A new season high score mean he might be a hold until after the bye, as he will both provide cover and make money.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 123,900 | |||
1 | 51 | 123,900 | ||
2 | 68 | 123,900 | ||
3 | 69 | 123,900 | ||
4 | 50 | 176,900 | ||
5 | 68 | 215,700 | ||
6 | 39 | 243,900 | ||
7 | 63 | 251,600 | ||
8 | 50 | 263,600 | ||
9 | 75 | 264,900 | ||
10 | 83 | 281,700 | ||
11 | 61.6 | 302,800 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 61.6 | 324,029 | 21,229 | 21,229 |
14 | 61.6 | 333,689 | 9,660 | 30,889 |
15 | 61.6 | 331,145 | -2,544 | 28,345 |
16 | 61.6 | 329,259 | -1,886 | 26,459 |
17 | 61.6 | 327,861 | -1,398 | 25,061 |
Cowan: Did not play.
L Jones: Still looks like time to sell, unless you want to hold for cover and sell R15.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 228,100 | |||
1 | 5 | 228,100 | ||
2 | 76 | 228,100 | ||
3 | 68 | 228,100 | ||
4 | 45 | 236,300 | ||
5 | 88 | 260,600 | ||
6 | 53 | 283,400 | ||
7 | 54 | 293,900 | ||
8 | 41 | 306,300 | ||
9 | 66 | 294,800 | ||
10 | 62 | 291,700 | ||
11 | 55.8 | 292,600 | ||
12 | 55.8 | 300,234 | 7,634 | 7,634 |
13 | 55.8 | 301,268 | 1,034 | 8,668 |
14 | 55.8 | 299,223 | -2,045 | 6,623 |
15 | ||||
16 | 55.8 | 297,707 | -1,516 | 5,107 |
17 | 55.8 | 296,583 | -1,124 | 3,983 |
Michalanney: Given his recent low scores he might lose more than if he goes at his average as in the projections.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 135,300 | |||
1 | 62 | 135,300 | ||
2 | 48 | 135,300 | ||
3 | 82 | 135,300 | ||
4 | 103 | 187,200 | ||
5 | 60 | 244,200 | ||
6 | 50 | 291,100 | ||
7 | 51 | 311,800 | ||
8 | 64 | 304,100 | ||
9 | 48 | 300,900 | ||
10 | 45 | 297,200 | ||
11 | 61.3 | 291,200 | ||
12 | 61.3 | 285,820 | -5,380 | -5,380 |
13 | 61.3 | 287,863 | 2,043 | -3,337 |
14 | ||||
15 | 61.3 | 296,768 | 8,906 | 5,568 |
16 | 61.3 | 303,370 | 6,601 | 12,170 |
17 | 61.3 | 308,263 | 4,893 | 17,063 |
Buckley: No idea why his scoring dropped. sell now or hold until his bye.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 205,000 | |||
1 | 76 | 205,000 | ||
2 | 99 | 205,000 | ||
3 | 99 | 205,000 | ||
4 | 80 | 275,900 | ||
5 | 78 | 330,300 | ||
6 | 87 | 360,100 | ||
7 | 91 | 377,400 | ||
8 | 99 | 395,800 | ||
9 | 44 | 419,900 | ||
10 | 62 | 417,600 | ||
11 | 81.5 | 402,200 | ||
12 | 81.5 | 383,153 | -19,047 | -19,047 |
13 | 81.5 | 386,039 | 2,886 | -16,161 |
14 | 81.5 | 397,021 | 10,982 | -5,179 |
15 | ||||
16 | 81.5 | 405,161 | 8,140 | 2,961 |
17 | 81.5 | 411,195 | 6,034 | 8,995 |
Stocker: Seems like a hold until after the byes.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 216,400 | |||
1 | 74 | 216,400 | ||
2 | 74 | 216,400 | ||
3 | 70 | 216,400 | ||
4 | 77 | 258,900 | ||
5 | 78 | 291,100 | ||
6 | 58 | 317,400 | ||
7 | 69 | 331,300 | ||
8 | 103 | 338,500 | ||
9 | 73 | 356,000 | ||
10 | 75 | 375,200 | ||
11 | 75.1 | 391,600 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 75.1 | 391,439 | -161 | -161 |
14 | 75.1 | 392,272 | 833 | 672 |
15 | 75.1 | 392,934 | 663 | 1,334 |
16 | 75.1 | 393,426 | 491 | 1,826 |
17 | 75.1 | 393,790 | 364 | 2,190 |
Mitchell: Really clear hold until his bye while he goes up a lot in value. Knock on wood, no jinks.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 123,900 | |||
1 | 123,900 | |||
2 | 123,900 | |||
3 | 123,900 | |||
4 | 123,900 | |||
5 | 67 | 123,900 | ||
6 | 79 | 123,900 | ||
7 | 41 | 123,900 | ||
8 | 54 | 176,600 | ||
9 | 74 | 210,300 | ||
10 | 82 | 232,700 | ||
11 | 66.2 | 267,500 | ||
12 | 66.2 | 299,027 | 31,527 | 31,527 |
13 | 66.2 | 318,844 | 19,817 | 51,344 |
14 | ||||
15 | 66.2 | 326,354 | 7,510 | 58,854 |
16 | 66.2 | 331,920 | 5,566 | 64,420 |
17 | 66.2 | 336,046 | 4,126 | 68,546 |
Weddle: Like Mitchell but on steroids. (Insert Essendon joke here)
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 130,800 | |||
1 | 130,800 | |||
2 | 130,800 | |||
3 | 130,800 | |||
4 | 130,800 | |||
5 | 130,800 | |||
6 | 130,800 | |||
7 | 38 | 130,800 | ||
8 | 54 | 130,800 | ||
9 | 65 | 130,800 | ||
10 | 114 | 168,200 | ||
11 | 67.8 | 230,200 | ||
12 | 67.8 | 282,526 | 52,326 | 52,326 |
13 | 67.8 | 322,559 | 40,033 | 92,359 |
14 | ||||
15 | 67.8 | 331,261 | 8,702 | 101,061 |
16 | 67.8 | 337,712 | 6,451 | 107,512 |
17 | 67.8 | 342,493 | 4,781 | 112,293 |
Atkins: One of those guys who you want to keep because of he R13 bye. Seems likely to go up price over that time.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 203,900 | |||
1 | 203,900 | |||
2 | 203,900 | |||
3 | 203,900 | |||
4 | 203,900 | |||
5 | 203,900 | |||
6 | 203,900 | |||
7 | 89 | 203,900 | ||
8 | 68 | 203,900 | ||
9 | 62 | 203,900 | ||
10 | 102 | 250,600 | ||
11 | 80.3 | 290,700 | ||
12 | 80.3 | 326,238 | 35,538 | 35,538 |
13 | ||||
14 | 80.3 | 360,855 | 34,618 | 70,155 |
15 | 80.3 | 376,653 | 15,798 | 85,953 |
16 | 80.3 | 388,363 | 11,710 | 97,663 |
17 | 80.3 | 397,043 | 8,680 | 106,343 |
Midfielders
Ashcroft: Hold, just hold.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 202,800 | |||
1 | 55 | 202,800 | ||
2 | 105 | 202,800 | ||
3 | 80 | 202,800 | ||
4 | 75 | 258,800 | ||
5 | 72 | 309,400 | ||
6 | 76 | 331,100 | ||
7 | 103 | 345,900 | ||
8 | 37 | 370,200 | ||
9 | 97 | 373,200 | ||
10 | 124 | 384,300 | ||
11 | 82.4 | 401,500 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 82.4 | 435,190 | 33,690 | 33,690 |
14 | 82.4 | 453,542 | 18,352 | 52,042 |
15 | 82.4 | 448,281 | -5,260 | 46,781 |
16 | 82.4 | 444,382 | -3,899 | 42,882 |
17 | 82.4 | 441,492 | -2,890 | 39,992 |
Baker: Classic hold until R15, unless you can somehow make more by harvesting him and using the cash.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 123,900 | |||
1 | 43 | 123,900 | ||
2 | 55 | 123,900 | ||
3 | 95 | 123,900 | ||
4 | 47 | 179,200 | ||
5 | 53 | 222,000 | ||
6 | 59 | 252,100 | ||
7 | 69 | 258,500 | ||
8 | 50 | 273,700 | ||
9 | 58 | 284,200 | ||
10 | 61 | 291,100 | ||
11 | 59.0 | 292,200 | ||
12 | 59.0 | 297,308 | 5,108 | 5,108 |
13 | 59.0 | 301,548 | 4,240 | 9,348 |
14 | 59.0 | 303,783 | 2,236 | 11,583 |
15 | ||||
16 | 59.0 | 305,441 | 1,657 | 13,241 |
17 | 59.0 | 306,669 | 1,228 | 14,469 |
Hollands: …pretty much a K-mart version of Baker.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 162,300 | |||
1 | 56 | 162,300 | ||
2 | 71 | 162,300 | ||
3 | 66 | 162,300 | ||
4 | 52 | 207,600 | ||
5 | 65 | 239,300 | ||
6 | 60 | 259,400 | ||
7 | 60 | 272,100 | ||
8 | 51 | 285,600 | ||
9 | 58 | 289,900 | ||
10 | 37 | 291,700 | ||
11 | 57.6 | 282,200 | ||
12 | 57.6 | 278,378 | -3,822 | -3,822 |
13 | 57.6 | 275,363 | -3,015 | -6,837 |
14 | 57.6 | 282,470 | 7,107 | 270 |
15 | ||||
16 | 57.6 | 287,737 | 5,268 | 5,537 |
17 | 57.6 | 291,642 | 3,905 | 9,442 |
Callaghan: At this point he looks like a trade out R15, like a high class Baker.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 244,000 | |||
1 | 101 | 244,000 | ||
2 | 45 | 244,000 | ||
3 | 37 | 244,000 | ||
4 | 65 | 263,600 | ||
5 | 72 | 261,700 | ||
6 | 77 | 271,900 | ||
7 | 88 | 298,800 | ||
8 | 59 | 328,300 | ||
9 | 85 | 345,700 | ||
10 | 68 | 361,600 | ||
11 | 69.7 | 363,800 | ||
12 | 69.7 | 370,651 | 6,851 | 6,851 |
13 | 69.7 | 368,791 | -1,860 | 4,991 |
14 | 69.7 | 368,183 | -608 | 4,383 |
15 | ||||
16 | 69.7 | 367,733 | -450 | 3,933 |
17 | 69.7 | 367,399 | -334 | 3,599 |
Rucks
Ratugolea: Has the magic bye and is a ruck. Hold.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 174,000 | |||
1 | 55 | 174,000 | ||
2 | 31 | 174,000 | ||
3 | 47 | 174,000 | ||
4 | 88 | 189,000 | ||
5 | 88 | 215,100 | ||
6 | 75 | 259,600 | ||
7 | 43 | 305,700 | ||
8 | 88 | 320,000 | ||
9 | 77 | 331,300 | ||
10 | 75 | 340,100 | ||
11 | 66.7 | 360,600 | ||
12 | 66.7 | 366,465 | 5,865 | 5,865 |
13 | ||||
14 | 66.7 | 366,142 | -323 | 5,542 |
15 | 66.7 | 362,138 | -4,003 | 1,538 |
16 | 66.7 | 359,171 | -2,967 | -1,429 |
17 | 66.7 | 356,971 | -2,200 | -3,629 |
Forwards
Mackenzie: If you own him, then probably a hold until his bye, since he does seem to be making money again.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 180,300 | |||
1 | 93 | 180,300 | ||
2 | 52 | 180,300 | ||
3 | 89 | 180,300 | ||
4 | 49 | 239,500 | ||
5 | 14 | 263,400 | ||
6 | 48 | 263,300 | ||
7 | 245,100 | |||
8 | 245,100 | |||
9 | 61 | 245,100 | ||
10 | 87 | 237,600 | ||
11 | 61.6 | 264,700 | ||
12 | 61.6 | 264,700 | ||
13 | 61.6 | 291,548 | 26,848 | 26,848 |
14 | ||||
15 | 61.6 | 299,942 | 8,394 | 35,242 |
16 | 61.6 | 306,164 | 6,222 | 41,464 |
17 | 61.6 | 310,776 | 4,612 | 46,076 |
Greene: Did not play.
Phillipou: Well, he plays over the bad byes and isn’t losing cash. Has not made much, maybe he’ll go big just once.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 166,800 | |||
1 | 76 | 166,800 | ||
2 | 59 | 166,800 | ||
3 | 51 | 166,800 | ||
4 | 61 | 207,700 | ||
5 | 67 | 231,200 | ||
6 | 39 | 251,700 | ||
7 | 20 | 261,800 | ||
8 | 56 | 251,200 | ||
9 | 43 | 238,900 | ||
10 | 63 | 231,200 | ||
11 | 53.5 | 244,600 | ||
12 | ||||
13 | 53.5 | 253,636 | 9,036 | 9,036 |
14 | 53.5 | 265,094 | 11,459 | 20,494 |
15 | 53.5 | 269,281 | 4,186 | 24,681 |
16 | 53.5 | 272,383 | 3,103 | 27,783 |
17 | 53.5 | 274,683 | 2,300 | 30,083 |
Phillips: Did play! If he is not the sub He’ll make cash. Hold until his bye?
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 158,300 | |||
1 | 65 | 158,300 | ||
2 | 158,300 | |||
3 | 78 | 158,300 | ||
4 | 67 | 158,300 | ||
5 | 74 | 212,400 | ||
6 | 36 | 255,900 | ||
7 | 269,400 | |||
8 | 269,400 | |||
9 | 269,400 | |||
10 | 70 | 269,400 | ||
11 | 65.0 | 281,000 | ||
12 | 65.0 | 285,832 | 4,832 | 4,832 |
13 | 65.0 | 302,564 | 16,732 | 21,564 |
14 | 65.0 | 312,699 | 10,135 | 31,699 |
15 | ||||
16 | 65.0 | 320,211 | 7,513 | 39,211 |
17 | 65.0 | 325,780 | 5,569 | 44,780 |
Chandler: Went big but not big enough to make his BE. Could make or ose from here. Hold to his bye? Yes, I say that a lot, because a lot of times it is a good plan, in general, for a lot of cows. Your cows may vary.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 123,900 | |||
1 | 93 | 123,900 | ||
2 | 71 | 123,900 | ||
3 | 90 | 123,900 | ||
4 | 59 | 206,800 | ||
5 | 56 | 252,800 | ||
6 | 85 | 279,400 | ||
7 | 104 | 297,200 | ||
8 | 57 | 331,400 | ||
9 | 42 | 358,000 | ||
10 | 86 | 357,600 | ||
11 | 74.3 | 348,600 | ||
12 | 74.3 | 350,133 | 1,533 | 1,533 |
13 | 74.3 | 365,917 | 15,783 | 17,317 |
14 | ||||
15 | 74.3 | 372,310 | 6,394 | 23,710 |
16 | 74.3 | 377,050 | 4,739 | 28,450 |
17 | 74.3 | 380,563 | 3,513 | 31,963 |
Davey: Well, 40 is more than zero. Hold…forever…..
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 117,300 | |||
1 | 58 | 117,300 | ||
2 | 45 | 117,300 | ||
3 | 66 | 117,300 | ||
4 | 45 | 163,400 | ||
5 | 191,600 | |||
6 | 44 | 191,600 | ||
7 | 211,900 | |||
8 | 31 | 211,900 | ||
9 | 7 | 212,000 | ||
10 | 41 | 194,400 | ||
11 | 42.1 | 179,700 | ||
12 | 42.1 | 174,070 | -5,630 | -5,630 |
13 | 42.1 | 185,824 | 11,754 | 6,124 |
14 | ||||
15 | 42.1 | 195,048 | 9,223 | 15,348 |
16 | 42.1 | 201,884 | 6,837 | 22,184 |
17 | 42.1 | 206,952 | 5,068 | 27,252 |
Simpson: Going so well until the 20. Which, oddly, makes him a hold. That 20 goes out of his average for R14, so his price will go up while he covers R14 & R15 Has the Magic bye.
Week | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 166,100 | |||
1 | 166,100 | |||
2 | 166,100 | |||
3 | 166,100 | |||
4 | 166,100 | |||
5 | 166,100 | |||
6 | 80 | 166,100 | ||
7 | 58 | 166,100 | ||
8 | 66 | 166,100 | ||
9 | 65 | 216,100 | ||
10 | 20 | 246,000 | ||
11 | 57.8 | 250,600 | ||
12 | 57.8 | 250,510 | -90 | -90 |
13 | ||||
14 | 57.8 | 247,179 | -3,331 | -3,421 |
15 | 57.8 | 261,850 | 14,671 | 11,250 |
16 | 57.8 | 272,725 | 10,875 | 22,125 |
17 | 57.8 | 280,787 | 8,061 | 30,187 |
Humphrey: Also has the magic bye. Hold.
Given | Score | Price | Proj. Change | Total Proj |
0 | 184,800 | |||
1 | 184,800 | |||
2 | 184,800 | |||
3 | 184,800 | |||
4 | 39 | 184,800 | ||
5 | 38 | 184,800 | ||
6 | 43 | 184,800 | ||
7 | -3 | 191,100 | ||
8 | 64 | 177,000 | ||
9 | 117 | 178,800 | ||
10 | 101 | 213,400 | ||
11 | 57.0 | 285,700 | ||
12 | 57.0 | 336,475 | 50,775 | 50,775 |
13 | ||||
14 | 57.0 | 346,905 | 10,430 | 61,205 |
15 | 57.0 | 334,683 | -12,221 | 48,983 |
16 | 57.0 | 325,624 | -9,059 | 39,924 |
17 | 57.0 | 318,910 | -6,715 | 33,210 |
Dodgy Advice: That was the stuff above. Well, ok, I’d still think about bringing in Humphrey. I would still fear bringing in Fyfe. I’d still want Darcy Cameron before too long.
Remember the Cow Talk guarantee: “All predictions wrong or triple your money back!” (Offer not valid if money is actually involved.)
I am time zonally challenged. When Cow Talk goes live, I’m probably asleep, so replies from me may take a while.
Thanks for reading!
Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom
Love it” a K mart baker”, keep up the good work or you off to the Philippines with an f.
Unfortunately for me because I traded him, but great for everyone who kept him, Sheezel looks like he has gone from being a cow to a stallion.
Hello Father, thankyou once again for this gracious sermon.
I’ve been trying to use your new chart from last week and now this week to try help me decide about Clayton in-or-out. I’m don’t think I was doing it right so just went old fashioned instead:
Clayton maintains 125 avg and out 4 weeks: 125 * 9 = 1125
Trade to 110 avg this week: 110 * 12[13 – 1 bye] = 1320
Clayton plays an extra game or two but lower average: 115 * 11 = 1265 or 120 * 11 = 1320
Seems like if he’ll play a hampered recovery game or two instead of being out 4 weeks, it would be worthwhile to hold if he eventually gets back to 130+s. Wondering if your make-up-value charts could work in reverse somehow for when trading a player down.
Don’t forget to include whoever is playing in his place while he is out. Probably add 4*50=200 to the 125 * 9 = 1125 for 1325.
They should work in reverse.
Bah, I’m very much in “Help, I’ve fallen and can’t get up” state when it comes to my rookies.
Don’t have Humphrey or Weddle – too late to bring them in.
I’ve got Simpson, Ginbie, Davey, Sharp, Chesser, Cincotta, Gould and Constable. Too much stagnation. I want to move to Ford or Wardlaw but I think it’s premature. Might have to just wait and see.
Thank god for Sheezel, Ashcroft, Ratkins and Mitchell.
Maybe not too late to bring in Weddle or Humphrey given the limited cash generation on offer elsewhere
You don’t need to go there. You have Baldwin whose on the bubble this week and the 2 Nth boys on the bubble next week.
Is it worth bringing in Weddle or Humphry if you stil have 21 trades??