Total Pts vs Avg – MIDs & Rucks

Written by Schwarzwalder on February 27 2019

(Written & Created By Macca)

The third instalment of these articles comparing total points verse averages, when deciding on your initial starting line-ups. Arguably one of the most difficult lines to select as there are many options across the clubs, and they usually cost you the most – so getting them right first up is potentially paramount to a successful year.

What are the key factors, aside from points and averages, that you will consider? Clearly, their role must be important. Player changes around them (trades etc – think Beams into that Pies midfield – will it make him or Treloar any better or worse, especially Treloar with a high average, BUT only 13 games and what must be dodgy hammies!) will also come into play.

If you’re a risk taker, you’ll also be looking at trying to find that elusive breakout (aka Champion Data favourite … excuse my sarcasm!) player. Who will be the next MacCrae, Cripps or Oliver? Are there any injuries to consider from the off season? And finally, can you afford the players … are there enough rookies across all lines to let you run that one extra mid or breakout player?

OK, total points first.

HIGHEST TOTAL POINTS

Name

Club

Position

Start Price

2018 Total

2018 Games

2018 Avg.

2017 Avg.

2016 Avg.

Mitchell, Tom 

Hawks

M

$700,800

2,840

22

129.1

118.9

104.0

Cripps, Patrick 

Blues

M

$648,200

2,627

22

119.4

97.7

107.6

Dangerfield, Patrick 

Cats

F M

$660,500

2,555

21

121.7

136.4

131.8

Oliver, Clayton 

Demons

M

$622,600

2,523

22

114.7

111.5

70.3

Neale, Lachie 

Lions

M

$607,300

2,461

22

111.9

109.0

112.6

Macrae, Jack

Bulldogs

M

$689,700

2,414

19

127.1

106.9

94.1

Yeo, Elliot

Eagles

M

$585,500

2,373

22

107.9

102.1

75.2

Selwood, Joel 

Cats

M

$570,500

2,312

22

105.1

102.2

111.5

Ward, Callan 

Giants

M

$568,000

2,302

22

104.6

99.7

105.6

Coniglio, Stephen 

Giants

M

$588,600

2,277

21

108.4

91.4

105.9

Sidebottom, Steele 

Pies

M

$551,700

2,236

22

101.6

96.0

106.2

Heppell, Dyson 

Bombers

M

$551,500

2,235

22

101.6

99.6

 

Westhoff, Justin 

Power

F M

$549,500

2,227

22

101.2

87.2

85.2

Merrett, Zach 

Bombers

M

$544,800

2,208

22

100.4

109.2

111.5

Menegola, Sam 

Cats

F M

$543,100

2,201

22

100

100.4

99.3

Martin, Dustin 

Tigers

M

$563,800

2,181

21

103.9

119.3

108.1

 

A couple extra listed here, from what I have done on the other lines which had double the number of positions in your side to review. Obviously because Titch is gone and Danger really should be in your forwards, if you are serious (from this list, a couple more of the duals sneak in with Menegola and the Hoff showing – exclude them too)!

For me, the top speak for themselves and are in most teams being posted on the Rate My Team threads. You can’t really go wrong with any of them as your starters I think … and it may just come down to questions of: Is Oliver’s shoulders up to it after surgery; will Macrae reproduce his stunning breakout (fuelled by CD favouritism!) form again or be impacted by the other Dogs mids; will Neale continue in the same vein at a new club or be impacted by potentially being the main tagger target?

Interestingly, in all teams and discussions, Geelong’s captain fantastic, Selwood, isn’t being mentioned and neither is Ward. Based on total points, you really wouldn’t be wrong having them either.

 

So, what do the total averages tell us and is there a ‘smoky’ in there?

HIGHEST AVERAGES

Name

Club

Position

Start Price

2018 Total

2018 Games

2018 Avg.

2017 Avg.

2016 Avg.

Mitchell, Tom 

Hawks

M

$700,800

2,840

22

129.1

118.9

104.0

Macrae, Jack

Bulldogs

M

$689,700

2,414

19

127.1

106.9

94.1

Dangerfield, Patrick 

Cats

F M

$660,500

2,555

21

121.7

136.4

131.8

Cripps, Patrick 

Blues

M

$648,200

2,627

22

119.4

97.7

107.6

Oliver, Clayton 

Demons

M

$622,600

2,523

22

114.7

111.5

70.3

Fyfe, Nat 

Dockers

M

$618,100

1,708

15

113.9

108.8

105.4

Kelly, Joshua 

Giants

M

$617,800

1,707

15

113.8

114.3

87.1

Neale, Lachie 

Lions

M

$607,300

2,461

22

111.9

109.0

112.6

Treloar, Adam 

Pies

M

$594,200

1,423

13

109.5

101.4

111.3

Coniglio, Stephen 

Giants

M

$588,600

2,277

21

108.4

91.4

105.9

Gaff, Andrew 

Eagles

M

$587,400

2,056

19

108.2

93.1

90.7

Yeo, Elliot

Eagles

M

$585,500

2,373

22

107.9

102.1

75.2

Ablett, Gary 

Cats

M

$580,600

1,925

18

106.9

114.8

114.1

Duncan, Mitch 

Cats

M

$576,500

2,124

20

106.2

109.8

92.3

Selwood, Joel 

Cats

M

$570,500

2,312

22

105.1

102.2

111.5

Ward, Callan 

Giants

M

$568,000

2,302

22

104.6

99.7

105.6

POTENTIAL BREAKOUT PLAYERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redden, Jack 

Eagles

M

$517,400

2,097

22

95.3

79.7

64.1

Steele, Jack 

Saints

M

$512,600

1,983

21

94.4

91.1

63.8

O’Meara, Jaeger 

Hawks

M

$503,200

1,854

20

92.7

63.8

0.0

Brayshaw, Angus 

Demons

M

$526,900

1,844

19

97.1

72.0

64.9

Miles, Anthony 

Suns

M

$342,000

90

1

90

71

90

 

So, the dual players drop out from the total points scored, and Fyfe, Kelly, Treloar, Coniglio and Gaff appear – as does the little master!! Could Gaz give us one last season, playing all games and maintaining or improving last years average?? … Wouldn’t it be nice? OK, lets look at those five mentioned above, or more importantly, three of them. Fyfe, Kelly and Treloar. Great averages, but total points and games limited due to injuries … are they worth the risk? Treloar also has the added potential impact of Beams returning – so factor that in as well.

Coniglio may well be worth starting with Shiel moving on and Gaff should be top 10 … after he serves his suspension. So, who are you selecting?

Note also the listed and much discussed possible breakout players with O’Meara included after losing Titch and another season under his belt. Certainly their averages increasing each year lends itself to the possibility they could step up to become elite. Miles in that Suns midfield … umm no.

 

Finally, the Rucks to look at – and this looks like the easiest choice … right?

RUCKS

On face value, it would seem that it doesn’t matter which way you look at the big men of the AFL … there are only two stand out choices … so let’s get to it!

HIGHEST TOTAL POINTS

Name

Club

Position

Start Price

2018 Total

2018 Games

2018 Avg.

2017 Avg.

2016 Avg.

Grundy, Brodie 

Pies

R

$708,200

2,870

22

130.5

97.3

95.7

Gawn, Max 

Demons

R

$692,100

2,805

22

127.5

91.6

118.6

Martin, Stefan 

Lions

R

$573,700

2,325

22

105.7

98.2

89.7

Goldstein, Todd 

Roos

R

$548,000

2,221

22

101

94.8

108.1

Sinclair, Callum 

Swans

R

$528,000

2,140

22

97.3

79.5

63.7

Nankervis, Toby 

Tigers

R

$533,000

2,062

21

98.2

88.8

74.8

 

Basically, dollars permitting, and your planned tactics … maybe bye numbers considered, if things stay much the same in 2019 as they did in 2018, then you only have two choices … they scored 500 more points then the next best!! That’s a lot of points to give up! And to win this thing, as I have said before, it’s all about points!

There has been much mentioned of Preuss potentially impacting Gawn. Will you let that affect you? Are you worried about the new 6-6-6 rule at centre bounces? (if you have read Ben’s recent article, Pracky Match: Blues V Hawks, 22 Feb, then it is his opinion that the rule will affect nothing – so premium rucks, with strong mids, that hit to advantage, will be the way to go!)

Can the others lift themselves up a few hundred points across the year and lift their averages by 10 or more? Do they have the mids around them to help this? Do they offer more than just rucking for their stats?

Factor all of this in … and let’s look at the top averages and a couple of discussed breakouts …

HIGHEST AVERAGES

Name

Club

Position

Start Price

2018 Total

2018 Games

2018 Avg.

2017 Avg.

2016 Avg.

Grundy, Brodie 

Pies

R

$708,200

2,870

22

130.5

97.3

95.7

Gawn, Max 

Demons

R

$692,100

2,805

22

127.5

91.6

118.6

Martin, Stefan 

Lions

R

$573,700

2,325

22

105.7

98.2

89.7

McEvoy, Ben 

Hawks

R

$553,100

1,732

17

101.9

95.2

66.8

Goldstein, Todd 

Roos

R

$548,000

2,221

22

101

94.8

108.1

Nankervis, Toby 

Tigers

R

$533,000

2,062

21

98.2

89

75

POTENTIAL BREAKOUT PLAYERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Witts, Jarrod 

Suns

R

$480,900

1,949

22

88.6

94.3

50.0

Longer, Billy 

Saints

R

$260,900

267

5

53.4

78

0

 

Hmm not a lot different is it? Although McEvoy replaces Sinclair – can he play all 22 games this year?

I think you will need to make your decisions based on your appetite for risk and whether you think it is better to have an extra mid (or potential breakout mid) as opposed to the two premium rucks. Ie you want cash on other lines. For me though, it’s about total points and trades – no point trading a ruck in later in the year if the top two from 2018 remain the top two … and it is hard to see why they won’t barring injury.

I’ll try a quick calculation (and am sure I will be corrected by those much better than me with these things and there is also some discussions on the site already along these lines):

If you choose Goldy over Gawn and use those dollars for say Miles at M6, and Goldy and Gawn continue to score the same, then I think the following applies: Over the first 10 rounds, you lose 27 points playing Goldy over Gawn. Thus, to even break even on the choice, Miles (or whoever) has to outscore the rookie you had at M6 (possibly Walsh) by at least 27 points per game to break even. More than this though, as you want that decision to net you greater points because, all things being equal, you will end up probably using another two trades getting Gawn in!! … (OK, shoot this bit down anyone, I’m sure it’s not that simple … but you get the idea!). In the end, it’s what makes the game interesting … and it will come down to taking risks and luck!! So good luck!!

On the above point, re trades, I can’t see either of the potential breakouts listed offering enough to be worth the trades – neither have midfields that will help their ruck scoring higher … But that’s just me!!

 

OK – that’s it from me … hopefully these articles have been useful and generated some great discussions! Good luck for your years, bring on JLT and please lets find some great rookies!!

11
0


Leave a comment / Scroll to bottom

13 thoughts on “Total Pts vs Avg – MIDs & Rucks”

  1. Brilliant stuff Macca. Grawndy locked and loaded … again! As you so rightly highlight … Points and trades are gold!

    7

    0
  2. Allsaints does Grundy and Gawn having the same bye week worry you at all? I have Grundy and Goldstein currently due to that reason alone. But if they continue to score like they did then overall will still score more points for the sake of possibly throwing a league win, which come to think of it the byes are crap for that regardless. Think I may have talked myself into changing my team gain to include Gawn. Oh no.

    2

    0
    1. No it doesn’t. While it’s obviously not ideal, I will be upgrading on other lines up to and including that Round to ensure I have 18+ on the field and 12+ premos. The upside will be the other two bye rounds which will hopefully more than compensate!

      Make sure you look at the byes as a single entity and NOT three individual rounds. It is your AGGREGATE score (if you’re going for overall) across the three byes, that should be your only focus. Hope that helps!

      9

      0
  3. Heppell in the top 10 mids for total points scored last year (when you exclude injured Titch and Danger, who should be F1). And yet i’d still rather have Merrett in my SC side than Heppell.

    Everyone betting on premo mids based on their averages, despite many of them not playing a full 22 last season. Food for thought.

    Great article!

    6

    0
    1. I have to agree Matt, while predicting averages is very hard, predicting games played is near impossible. Yes there are a few injury prone players who are more likely to miss games and a few durable players more likely play most games but the rest is just luck. I just try to not pick too many injury prone players and base the rest on potential ave.

      4

      0
  4. Excellent series of articles Macca. This really makes me reconsider having both Fyfe and Kelly in my side. I may have to drop one of them and swap in a more reliable option.

    4

    0
    1. Yes Tebs that’s what I am looking at too. Whilst they tend to average really well, they both carry a history of injuries / suspensions and to cap it all off, Fyfe is having some surgery on his elbow it seems.

      Risk appetite to factor in – do you play them for say 10 rounds before they get injured / suspended etc and whilst they may score say 10 points each week then another mid, does that make up for losing them for a few weeks ( or a full trade out) and having to play a 60+ rookie mid? Of course they may play all 22 games – but that’s the joy and anguish of the game!
      Remember this is also aimed at setting up your starting side – you will trade in those that are going well as the year progresses no doubt!

      Also apologies all for the tables of using a phone – they are awful!!

      4

      0
  5. How many points did Gawn score forward of centre last year? Do you believe that he will again score those points forward of centre with Preuss in the team?
    Rationale suggests that Max will be 100k+ cheaper before round 10

    1

    2
    1. What I meant to say is I wouldn’t start goldstien instead of Max I’d start Macrae or Cripps instead of Max and then start Preuss or an even cheaper rookie ruck who plays instead of Walsh.
      Max wont increase in price and Cripps wont decrease and I doubt that Preuss will decrease with a b.e of 44.
      Maybe if you already had Cripps and/or macrae you could turn a Bewley or Hind into a Dusty ,Bont, Cogs, Jelwood and have an extra 100-120k to upgrade a mid-pricer into a premo

      4

      0
      1. Yeah David – I get where you are coming from and as AllSaints points out very well, it’s all relative – and it’s all a big part of this game – everyone has their own thoughts and perspectives and risk verse reward appetites.

        For me the two rucks where miles in front of the next best placed mids last year and, barring injury (in which case you can trade them for pretty much anyone) I don’t see them much different this year.
        Also, I don’t think Macrae will score anywhere as well this year as he was clearly a CD favourite last year because there we a few games I watched closely and there was no way he actually earnt the stats he was credited for – but that’s just me!! Cripps though is definitely there for me! And depending on my risk view I’m not sure if I’m brave enough for Fyfe and kelly!

        It’s two trades and dollars I don’t have to find and whether they lose value is irrelevant if I hold them all year – as long as they maintain their scoring. All players are inflated to start the year from their finishing point last year as has been well pointed out by few of our posters.

        Anyway good luck mate whichever way you go and it’s good that everyone chooses their own setups otherwise it would be very boring and annoying with having vanilla type teams!!

        3

        0
    2. It’s all relative. If everyone scores the same as they did last year, they’ll all drop 10%.
      He improved his non-ruck work last year sitting behind play and taking intercepts, or going to the goal-square for a one-on-one and kicking a goal.
      Yes, he had 90% of HTAs for the Dees last year, but as the best tap RUC in the comp and improving other aspects of his game, see Preuss as no more than a McDonald FWD pinch-hitter come season proper. As the best centre clearance side in the comp, the Dees are not gonna compromise if they want to go two better in 2019. LOCKED for me.

      5

      0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *